Cheers Review

Cheers for me is really the premier American sitcom. Nearly every major sitcom since has taken from it in some way or another and it continues to win new fans through reruns and DVD releases.

It has left an incredible legacy through its massive influence on popular culture and also its spin off Frasier which lasted 11 years as well.

I myself did not grow up with Cheers. In fact I was born many years after it had finished its original run. I grew up with Frasier and obviously it was through Frasier that I discovered Cheers.

Cheers may seem somewhat dated for today’s audiences, but by and large I think it can still have a broad appeal, as overall the bar the main characters frequent is almost like a bubble outside of the real world.

I think that’s the key to creating a truly timeless sitcom is to create a whole unique little world for its characters to inhabit. Examples of this course include Craggy Island in Father Ted, the bookshop in Black Books, and the main characters apartments in Friends.

Cheers I think absolutely succeeded in creating its own world and that among other reasons is why it has lasted.

In this article I will be giving my opinions on Cheers, reviewing all of its characters, the 10 best episodes (in my opinion) and ultimately what its legacy is.

Overview

Cheers ran for 11 seasons from 1982-93. It was created by James Burrows, Glen  and Les Charles. Originally the creators had considered remaking Fawlty Towers, but decided to make their remake its own series about a bar when they realized all of the scenes in their remake took place in the Hotels bar. Among the other influences on Cheers were The Mary Taylor Moore Show and the radio show Duffy’s Tavern.

The show revolved around the bar Cheers which was run by retired baseball player Sam Malone played by Ted Danson. Though Sam had once been a very successful and talented player his career came to an end due to his alcoholism.

He bought the bar Cheers when he was an alcoholic and still holds on to it after he becomes sober for sentimental reasons. His former Coach and close friend, the slow witted but sweet natured Ernie Pantuso played by the late Nicholas Colassanto is a bartender there, whilst Cheers two waitresses are the volatile Carla Tortelli played by Rhea Pearlman and the kind hearted, but pretentious and snobbish Diane Chambers who ends up working at the bar when her fiance jilts her in the pilot episode.

The bar is frequented by lazy slob Norm Peterson played by George Wendt and know nothing know it all Cliff Clavin played by John Ratzenberger. Cliff and Norm are best friends whilst Carla though scornful of everyone, dislikes both Diane and Cliff in particular, with both of them being the recipients of her extreme verbal and at times physical cruelty.

Whilst Sam is portrayed as being a washed up ball player, he is still a hero to the patrons and staff at Cheers (except for Diane) not only for his sports career, but also due to his many sexual conquests which he is fond of boasting about.

The shows first season revolves around the underlying sexual tension between Sam and Diane whilst the second season sees Sam and Diane enter into an awkward romantic relationship with one another. At the end of the second season the two have a bad break up and Diane leaves Cheers and suffers a complete mental breakdown afterwards.

She later falls for her psychiatrist Dr Frasier Crane played by Kelsey Grammer and returns to the bar at the start of season 3 along with Frasier in order to help Sam recover from his relapse into alcoholism after his painful break up with Diane. Diane eventually comes back to working at Cheers and Frasier also begins to frequent the bar too due to his relationship with Diane.

Series 3 revolves mostly around the love triangle between Sam, Diane and Frasier. Despite their different personalities and their feud over Diane, Frasier and Sam end up becoming friends, and eventually best friends in later seasons.

Series 3 ends with Diane and Frasier about to get married whilst Sam tries to break it up having realized he is still in love with her.

In season 4 we discover that Sam never managed to make it to their wedding, whilst Diane jilted Frasier at the altar. Frasier later shows up at the bar angry at Sam whom he blames for all his woes. Despite this however he and Sam still remain friends and Frasier continues to frequent the bar eventually becoming one of the gang developing friendships with Norm and Cliff and Carla over their shared hatred of Diane. Diane once again returns to work at Cheers and though she and Sam maintain that they are over one another, the end of series 4 sees Sam propose to Diane. Series 4 also sees Woody Boyd played by Woody Harrelson replace Coach as Cheers bartender. Nicholas Collasanto sadly passed away just before the end of series 3 and thus the character of Coach passes away in between series 3 and 4.

Woody is similarly portrayed as a slow witted, but sweet natured character, though he is much younger than Coach, and where as Coach served as a mentor figure to Sam, Woody is more like a surrogate little brother to Sam and greatly looks up to him.

Season 5 sees Diane at first reject Sam’s proposal only to realize that she was wrong. She then spends the next half a season trying to win him back until he eventually relents (after a court case!) and the two decide to get married.

Series 5 also sees the introduction of Fraiser Crane’s love interest the cold natured, logical psychiatrist Dr Lilith Sternin played by Bebe Neuwirth.

The end of series 5 sees Diane not marry Sam after she gets a deal to publish a book she has writte. Though at first she states she would rather marry Sam, Sam eventually tells her that she should pursue her dream and she leaves the bar for good.

After his finale break up from Diane, Sam sells Cheers and buys a boat that he goes sailing around the world with. His boat sinks and he returns to Cheers where he is eventually able to convince its new manager Rebecca Howe played by Kirsty Alley whom Sam is enamoured with to give him a job as a bartender.

Initially Rebecca is portrayed as a cold, ice woman much like Lilith Sternin, but as time goes on she is shown to be more emotionally unstable and a total screw up. Over the course of her time there she loses the bar’s liquor license gets fired twice, and eventually burns the entire bar to the ground by accident.

Over the course of the next several series all of the characters undergo major changes in their lives. Frasier and Lilith get married and have a son called Frederick, whilst Woody also gets married to an equally slow, but kind hearted millionaire Kelly Gaines whilst Carla also gets married to a former Hockey player Eddie LeBec who is eventually killed in a tragic accident. Sam meanwhile also not only has a rather nasty feud with neighbouring bar Gary’s old Town Tavern, but also with his upstairs neighbour John Hill who takes great delight in tormenting Sam, but also ends up having a relationship of sorts with the widowed Carla.

In the shows final series Rebecca finally manages to find love with a plumber whilst Lilith cheats on Frasier and leaves him. However Lilith eventually returns to him by the end of the shows run though the man who she left Frasier for Dr Pascal goes insane and even threatens Frasier and the gang at Cheers with a gun when she tries to return to Frasier before being arrested.

The final episode sees Diane now a successful award winning writer return to Cheers where she attempts to reconcile her relationship with Sam only for the two of them to realize that they will never be able to make it work.

Initially Cheers was something of a ratings disaster finishing 74th out of 77 places. However its strong critical acclaim as well as its Summer reruns helped the shows ratings improve to the point where it eventually became one of the most popular television series of all time by the end of its run. The final ever episode of Cheers was watched by over 90 million people in the US alone.

Following the end of Cheers a spin off devoted to the character of Frasier Crane began airing in 1993. Frasier as it was known saw the good Doctor divorce from Lilith and move to his home town of Seattle where he becomes a successful Radio Psychiatrist. Frasier would ultimately run for 11 seasons until 2004. Though Frasier was mostly divorced from Cheers many characters from Cheers did still make guest appearances in Frasier.

Lilith Sternin not surprisingly appeared the most, appearing in 12 episodes in total of Frasier and almost an episode per season. Diane Chambers appeared in 4 episodes, whilst Sam Malone and Woody Boyd appeared in an episode each.

Finally Cliff Claven, Carla Tortelli, Norm Peterson and Paul Krapance, a barfly played by Paul Wilson who became a major recurring character in Cheers later years, all appeared in a season 10 episode “Cheerful Goodbyes” set in Boston 10 years after Cheers had finished its run.

In addition to Frasier there was also another short lived spin off centering around Carla’s sleazy ex husband Nick Tortelli title “The Tortelli’s”. Cheers also had a number of crossovers with an another American sitcom called Wings with the characters of Frasier Crane, Lilith Sternin, Cliff Clavin, Norm Peterson and Rebecca Howe all appearing in different episodes of Wings. Finally there was also a Spanish remake of Cheers which was released in 2011 whilst another Irish language remake is currently in the works.

Best Seasons

Now obviously this is purely subjective, but still I feel that Cheers in contrast to its spin off Frasier whose quality declined somewhat in its final seasons, actually got better in its later years. Whenever I pop on a Cheers DVD its always the later seasons I go to first and whenever I want to introduce one of my friends to the show then it is the later years I show them.

I suppose Cheers can really be divided into two eras. The Diane Chambers years season 1-5 and the Rebecca Howe years seasons 6-11.

Whilst I am clearly a bigger fan of the Rebecca years, I will admit that I think that the Diane years are probably the ones people remember more. Sam and Diane were really the first Ross and Rachel, Leonard and Penny the big comedic romance, so I think that’s probably why they tended to stick in peoples memory more.

However still when you actually watch the Sam and Diane years back I just don’t think they hold up as well as Rebecca’s time on the show.

To start with I never really bought them as a couple. I know the whole point was meant to be despite their incompatibility they were still in love, but still I think the writers made them seem too incompatible. In this respect I think they were like Niles and Daphne from Frasier another couple I could just never buy, which is similarly why the later years of Frasier were not quite as good as the earlier seasons for me.

Another reason I didn’t like Sam and Diane was because I felt they overshadowed the other characters a bit too much. The Sam and Diane story was so overwhelming that other characters I don’t think really got a chance to breathe as much until after it had ended.

Also I found the Sam and Diane storyline to be quite tedious at times too. It did have its moments, but overall it got very repetitive. They liked each other but didn’t admit it, then they were together, then they were apart and liked each other but didn’t admit it, then they were together and then apart and liked each other but didn’t admit it. That was basically the show for 5 seasons.

I also didn’t enjoy the lady and the tramp dynamic Sam and Diane had either.

The series I liked the best out of the Sam and the Diane years was actually the finale one series 5. I felt that this was actually the only time Sam and Diane seemed to work. It might have been because the writers knew that they were coming to an end of the story due to Shelly Long’s leaving the series so rather than simply try and prolong it like they had done for series 1-4 here they actually rounded it off. I also think in series 5 they make Diane more fun too, by making her go more crazy. In the first 4 series Diane is portrayed as the voice of reason and the sophisticated one with her mental health problems being taken seriously. However in series 5 Diane’s neurosis get out of control as seen in the episode “Simon Says” where she drives John Cleese’s character to a mental breakdown and thus she actually becomes more hilarious.

In all fairness to Diane however its not just because of the whole Sam and Diane story that series 1-5 are weaker, but also because I feel that these years overall are more overtly sentimental and somewhat dated.

The reason the earlier Cheers are more dated is because I feel they tended to touch on more topical issues than the later years did. For instance the episode “Boys in the Bar” though groundbreaking at the time might seem somewhat dated by todays standards. Its not that its homophobic its the very opposite, but its just the idea of the main characters being portrayed as homophobic to get the point it makes across about how homophobia can sadly spring up in many situations even among normally decent people might seem a little bit odd in say a modern sitcom like “The Big Bang Theory”. Imagine watching Leonard and Howard not want a gay man to work with them to show how homophobia can exist in a workplace. Like I said it would seem a little bit off, it was actually a very risky episode to do way back in 1982, but nowadays I don’t think anyone would really have the guts to do a story like that that casts their main characters who are normally decent people in such a negative light.

There is also more focus on Sam’s career as a baseball player too, which again helps to date it, and also make it I feel somewhat more inaccessible overseas too.

Finally these earlier years are far too mushy in a lot of places for my liking. I must admit I do not like it when sitcoms get too mushy. It may be because I am British and our sitcoms tend to be the very opposite of sentimental. The likes of Bottom, Black Books and Fawlty Towers could not be more cold and unfeeling. That’s really the difference between British and American sitcoms is that British sitcoms do tend to feature more horrible characters, whilst the characters in American sitcoms tend to be more likable. Normally I don’t mind it except when it gets a bit too mushy which I feel the first few seasons of Cheers did too often.

Of course again don’t think this means I dislike the earlier years, but I do think Cheers vastly improves from season 6 on in quite a number of big ways.

To start with Rebecca is a much better character than Diane and a much better foil for Sam Malone. The thing about Sam is I think he needs someone to really put him in his place. He is the big cocky womanizer who never stops going on about how irresistable he is so its always fun watching someone, particularly a woman take him down a peg or two. Diane never really did that. She insulted him frequently yes, but ultimately she always gave into his macho charm and often the point was her hostility towards him was simply masking her attraction and even love for him.

Rebecca however never fell for his charm at all. Instead she always put him in his place and often humiliated him in front of the rest of the gang. Among the most hilarious examples of this include the season 6 episode “Kiss Off” where Rebecca tricks Sam and Woody into kissing one another and “Sisterly Love” where she makes Sam believe she has killed her sister. I think Rebecca really caused Ted Danson to up his performance. He had always of course been excellent in the role of Sam, but opposite Rebecca I think he was able to bring a more physical aspect to his performance and show us a more humorously pathetic side to Sam Malone. During the Diane years Sam was a more romantic character. As I said he and Diane had a real Lady and the Tramp thing going on. During the Rebecca years however his obsession with her was not romantic, it was just shallow and we saw him resort to cheap tricks to try and win Rebecca over, which almost always blew up in his face and left him at various points kissing Woody, crying at the thought of Rebeca murdering her sister or chained up in a lift with his trousers pulled down in front of people.

Also Rebecca’s story arc was more interesting to me. It was quite fun watching this powerful ice woman degenerate into a complete train wreck by the end of the shows run. Rebecca changed a lot more over the course of her time on the show than Diane did. Its hard to imagine the Rebecca we see at the start whom everyone, even Carla is intimidated by as being the same person as the desperate mess who screams like a petulant child at her father in series 11. With Diane however in her first appearance she is a pretentious snob who clearly has a thing for Sam and in her finale appearance she is a pretentious snob who clearly has a thing for Sam.

During the Rebecca years the other characters at the bar I think were also given more to do as well. Rebecca’s storyline didn’t smother the rest of the cast like the Sam and Diane story line did. For instance in Rebecca’s time we saw Frasier get married, have a son, saw his marriage with Lilith break down and him ultimately have to face Lilith’s ex who pulled a gun on him. Woody meanwhile we saw get married, become an actor and eventually enter into politics. Carla we saw get married and then have to deal with her husbands death and enter into a twisted relationship with John Hill. Even with Cliff we saw more of his mother Ma Clavin, who proved to be a wonderful character and his home life too. There were also more minor characters introduced during these years too.  Paul a barfly became a major supporting character in the later seasons and proved to be a brilliant foil for Norm and Cliff. Woody’s love interest Kelly Gaines and her family as well as Henri, the rude French man who regularly tries to steal Kelly away from Woody, also became regular supporting characters too and were responsible for some of the most hilarious moments in the shows history, such as Henri’s attempts to marry Kelly. Just listening to Henri say “I am going to steal your girlfriend” in his Inspector Clueso voice is enough to make me chuckle in itself. Rebecca’s love interest Robin Colcort also became a prominent supporting character and had many great moments too such as his chess match with Sam or his tricking the bar into turning on each other in his finale appearance. Then there was John Hill who is one of my all time favorite characters and was just the perfect nemesis for Sam. Watching him drive Sam insane is absolute comedy gold and is another example of Ted Danson’s performance really benefiting from being able to interact with other characters besides Diane. Much like with Henri all John Hill has to do is say Sam in such an obnoxious fashion to make me laugh every single time. Gary Sam’s other nemesis though introduced during the Diane years was given more to do in the last 6 years. Similarly Lilith and Eddie Carla’s husband and Ma Clavin though all introduced during Diane’s time also became more prominent in the Rebecca years too.

The reason they were able to introduce these supporting characters or give previous supporting characters more screen time during the Rebecca years was simply because they didn’t have to make everything focus around this big love story. Thus the stories and the characters were considerably more varied in season 6-11.

The Rebecca years I feel were also far less mushy. The storylines were generally wilder and more surreal during Rebecca’s time and finally they also didn’t try and touch on topical issues as much. The Rebecca years took place in their own crazy world where anything could happen and as a result they are the years of the show that I don’t think have really dated at all and are certainly more accessible to modern audiences.

Thus if I were to rate my favorite seasons I would say it would probably go like this.

Season 11 is probably my favorite as I think it contains the greatest episodes, as well as one of my all time favorite story arcs with the Lilith and Frasier breaking up storyline.

Season 10 would be my second favorite season as again I think it simply has a very strong number of episodes and an excellent mix of supporting characters too. There are plenty of good Lilith and Frasier episodes this year too, who were always my favorite Cheers couple.

Season 6 would be next up as I really feel this is when the show came into its own. That’s not to say the first 5 years were bad, but this is really when I think the show finally found its identity, not as a show simply about an incompatible couple, but a whole bar full of very different people.

Season 7 is next up as I think this is when the Rebecca character really becomes the insane klutz we all know and love. The final episode which sees her go insane and have to be carried out whilst screaming at a lecherous colleague of Frasiers is one of my all time favorite Cheers moments.

Season 8 I think is a great series as its really when we see a lot of interesting changes in a lot of the main characters lives such as Frasier’s son being born.

Season 9 meanwhile was again a good solid season with plenty of stand out episodes and again much like 10 and 11 it benefits from a good mix of characters.

Season 5 is the best of the Diane years in my opinion. There are still a few tedious Sam and Diane episodes, but it feels almost like a prototype of the Rebecca years as more characters are beginning to get more air time. There are some absolute classics this year such as “Simon Says” and “Dinner at Eightish”, and Diane is a much more humorous character this year, with her negative qualities really being played up like never before.

Season 1, though this is the series that is most of its time. It still nevertheless is probably the season of the Sam and the Diane years that gives everyone a lot to do. Even though it is still very Sam and Diane heavy it does give other characters  chance to shine too and Coach is a very likable character and a great foil to Sam. Less intelligent than him, but also somewhat older and wiser too.

Season 4 though not the strongest series does still have a few notable high points such as the introduction of Lilith and also seeing Frasier go from the unlikable, pompous snob from season 3 to the likable pompous snob in season 4 and all seasons of Cheers and Frasier from that point on is quite interesting.

Season 2 a fairly mediocre season. This is when the balled of Sam and Diane really started to become tedious and even at places quite creepy. There are some good episodes here and there, but this is not that great a season for me overall.

Season 3 the worst season of Cheers in my opinion, this season has the highest number of poor episodes for me. Also the main characters seem a bit too unlikable this year. Sam seems like a bit of a creep, Diane seems selfish, Frasier seems condescending and arrogant, but not in a funny way like he later would. Also the atmosphere at the bar seems a lot less friendly too. Perhaps this is because of the behind the scenes tragedy of Nicholas Collasanto’s illness and eventual death. Finally this series is when the show I think was at its most soap operaish Whatever the case this is the only season of Cheers 11 year run that I actually largely dislike, though even it has its moments.

Top 10 Episodes

10/ Abnormal Psychology

This was not Lilith’s first appearance in the show, but it was the beginning of her relationship with Frasier. I found Lilith and Frasier to be not only the best couple in Cheers, but among the best couple’s in sitcom history. The two characters are just perfect for each other and both Kelsey Grammer and Bebe Neuwirth have excellent chemistry. The highlight is definitely the final moment where Frasier find himself captivated by Liliths beauty so much he goes into a huge speech about how he is going to kiss her for 10 minutes only for Lilith to kiss him first.

9/ How to Win Friends and Electrocute People

My fave Cliff centric episode. This episode is great as to start with you think it is going to be quite a sad episode when Cliff learns from Frasier how disliked he is by the rest of the Cheers gang. However they turn it on its head wonderfully by giving us a gut burstingly funny scene of Cliff trying to improve his personality through electroshock treatment. Every time he says something obnoxious his therapist shocks him, which as you can imagine is quite often. The other thing I like about this episode is that it addresses how badly the other main characters treat Cliff. I often felt that the Cheers gang were a little too hard on Cliff. All except for Diane and Frasier and Sam. Okay he is annoying but he is never nasty so whilst it was funny at times it could feel a little bit much the way they all came down on him, so it was good that they addressed that here and had the gang actually feel bad for treating him so poorly.

8/ Daddy’s Little Middle Aged Girl

One of my favorite Rebecca going crazy episodes. I love the moment when we see her scream at her father and run into his office. Rebecca’s father is also one of my favorite guest stars. At first he seems like a totally unsympathetic character. A bullying, controlling father who wants to control his daughters life and still treats her like a 5 year old. However by the end of the episode when we find out his real motives and see how Rebecca is leeching off of him and bleeding him dry, the dynamic completely changes and we end up feeling sorry for him instead. Kirstie Alley is absolutely brilliant throughout this episode and gives one of the best performances of her career.

7/ Pick A Con Any Con

Now one of the reasons I love this episode is because its very Harry the Hat centric. I love Harry the Hat and I think its a real shame that he wasn’t featured in more episodes. Though I am glad that the episodes he was featured in where always great. The great thing about Harry was you were never sure whose side he was on. He was a lying, cheating, self serving, two faced con man, but ultimately in spite of that he would always come through for the Cheers gang and its surprisingly heartwarming watching him help Coach. It might not be the funniest episode of Cheers, but it has a great story nonetheless.

6/ Thanksgiving Orphans

 One of the most celebrated episodes of Cheers, its really not hard to see why. This episode is quite unique among the earlier seasons in that it features the whole gang outside of Cheers for the most of it. Its great watching them all hang out together like a large dysfunctional family. There are plenty of great little moments like Frasier getting angry at people moving the tv away from him, Carla sealing Diane out of her house, but the real highlight is the big food fight at the end. The best moment is when Diane tries to be the voice of reason and stop everyone from fighting only for Sam to pelt her with food in the middle of her speech. This episode is also notable for being the only time we come close to seeing Vera whose face is concealed with a pie thrown by Diane that was meant for Sam.

5/ Bad Neighbor Sam

John Hill’s first ever appearance. Now I am a big fan of John Hill. I always loved the way he was just a complete dick. There was no reason for him to be, he just was it was as simple as that. Watching him mess with Sam in this episode is just an absolute riot, but the best moment is at the end when Sam goes completely insane and rather pathetically tries to destroy Hills mat only to fail miserably. Ted Danson has always been great at doing anger and that’s why this episode and all of the Hill vs Sam episodes are such a joy for me as few people can get under Sam’s skin the way Hill does.

4/ Bar Wars 5 The Final Judgement

Obviously I wanted to have a Bar Wars episode in this list. I thought about including the final Bar Wars story which sees Harry the Hat finally get Gary. However I think this is the best episode by far simply because the prank Gary pulls on Sam is legendary. Its such a brilliant twist the way that Gary is able to get the Cheers gang themselves to turn on Sam. Even though you know its a set up throughout all of it when Gary appears at the end you still can’t help but burst out laughing.

3/ A Fine French Whine

I always loved Henri. Him the sleazy, lying, two faced conman opposite the sweet, unsuspecting, slow witted Kelly was just a match made in comedic heaven.

I love the way this episode doesn’t even attempt to make Henri even remotely sympathetic or likable such as his going on about how he has no desire to ever get a job or admitting to Kelly that his plan was to trick her into marrying him, have his way with her, and then divorce her so that he could steal her money.

Whats even more hilarious is the way Kelly instantly forgives him for all of this at the same time. She is so sweet she just can’t find it in herself to hate anyone.

2/ The Bar Manager, The Shrink, His Wife and Her Lover

Lilith and Frasier episodes are always a delight, but this one is my definite favorite. Its got a brilliant story and so many laugh out loud moments. I love watching Liliths crazed ex Dr Pascal hold the whole Cheers gang up with a gun and their various ways of trying to get out of it. Its one of these things I just never get tired of watching. Cliff’s suggestion of soiling his pants and crying, or Rebecca’s of seducing Pascal and John Hills unbelievable disdain for Rebecca’s idea are all just priceless.

I think my favorite moment might be when John Hill just completely blunders into the hostage situation without knowing it.

The final scene where Lilith and Frasier reconcile is both humorous and strangely touching as well. Of course we all know due to the spin off Frasier that the two’s reconciliation ultimately did not last long, but still when watching Cheers on its own its a fitting ending to their turbulent romance.

1/ Simon Says

Yes I know its ironic considering my preference for the Rebecca years that I would rate a Diane episode as my favorite. And even more ironic that its actually the Sam and Diane aspect of it that makes it a favorite of mine.

John Cleese guest stars in this episode and its really his show stealing performance that makes this such a classic. Cleese plays brilliantly off of everyone. He and Frasier’s friendship is brilliant the way it seems so genuine at first, but then we see how they really hate each other and Simon actually enjoys cheating him out of money and boasts about it to his wife. However credit where credit is due, its Shelly Long that plays the best off of him as Diane drives him insane culminating in his classic Basil Fawltyesque outburst at the end.

I would have loved to have seen John Cleese’s character show up in Frasier. As he was Frasiers friend there would have been a reason for him to show up. Maybe he could have helped Maris and Niles. We could have also had them both finally learn how much they truly hate each other.

Characters

Sam Malone

The shows main character, Sam is also I would say the best character in the series. Ted Danson carried the series. He was able to make Sam seem like an intensely likable character, yet at the same time he was also able to make him seem like someone who you don’t mind seeing humiliated by Gary, Rebecca or Diane.

Sam is cocky, but not in a nasty, horrible way. You can’t help but be won over by his cockiness, but because he is so full of himself its always so funny to watch him get taken down a peg or two.

Sam is really the linchpin that holds the whole show together because he is so likable he can get on with anyone. He can be friendly with the pompous intellectual Frasier Crane, the simpleton Cliff Clavin, the nasty piece of work Carla, the lazy lay about Norm Peterson and the emotional train wreck Rebecca Howe. If it weren’t for Sammy I don’t think you’d believe as a viewer that all of these vastly different characters could hang out with each other.

He’s the person that can bring all of them together as a tight little group. The show just simply could not work without Sam.

Though Danson has gone on to enjoy a very successful career since I think Sam Malone will always be the role that Danson will be remembered for.

Frasier Crane

Kelsey Grammer really made the character of Frasier into what he was. Originally Frasier was supposed to be that guy who nobody liked, whose soul purpose was to get in the way of Sam and Diane’s love story and then be dumped after a few episodes.

However Grammer made him into so much more. He always managed to get a laugh even when given the flattest lines and proved to have excellent chemistry with the rest of the cast, Ted Danson in particular.

Thus Frasier not only went on to become a regular on Cheers, but consequently the star of his own spin off series that lasted as long as Cheers.

In hindsight its easy to say how special the character of Frasier is, but at the time I am not sure that many people would have named him as the one to star in his own series.

However when you watch Cheers its obvious that Frasier even in Cheers is capable of carrying a series on his own. His episodes with Lilith often feel like a different show to the rest of Cheers already. There are whole episodes where Frasier can go without the rest of the gang and just hang around with Lilith and when those two are together you don’t even notice that none of the others are around.

Diane Chambers

Now I have mixed feelings towards the character of Diane. Shelly Longs performance was always excellent. She could cope with the both the serious (which she was often called on to do more than any other cast member even Danson) and the comedic moments too.

However I do think that Diane’s relationship with Sam did overshadow the earlier years a bit too much.

However there is no denying that the Sam and Diane relationship was incredibly influential not just on other series, but in the overall direction of Cheers and Frasier too.

The makers of Cheers and Frasier loved the dynamic they had with Sam and Diane of uptight, more refined, snobby character with a taste for the finer things playing opposite a more uncouth, regular Joe and they would try and replicate it many times. Frasier and Lilith with the rest of the gang are this and yes even Martin and Frasier are this. Obviously there is no romantic angle in the Martin and Frasier relationship, but the same idea of the pompous intellectual and the person with the more simple tastes being forced to be together (in this case live together) and finding it difficult because of their different personalities has shades of Sam and Diane.

I think Diane’s biggest strength as an individual character is the fact that she is so kind and loyal. A lot of the time she serves not only as the voice of reason, but the moral compass of the gang such as in “The Boys in the Bar” or “Cliffies Rockie Moment” where Diane is the only one who stands up for Cliff when a bully is trying to intimidate him.

However having said that I feel Diane was at her best in series 5 when they actually made the character more unlikable. This series contains some of her funniest moments such as her driving Cleese’s character mad or her disasterous attempts at being a dancer or her butchering the movie they made to convince Woody’s parents to let him stay in Boston.

Overall whilst Diane is not my favorite character in the series I don’t deny that the show probably wouldn’t have been the success with viewers it was in the earlier years without her and her relationship with Sam or begrudge her her incredibly important place in television history.

Rebecca Howe

One of my favorite characters Rebecca probably makes me laugh more than anyone else in the series. There are just so many moments where her character has a complete break down that should actually be upsetting as often you are watching a persons entire life just collapse, but instead makes you laugh. Among my favorite moments are when she breaks down at her father,  gets drunk at her engagement party and pronounces it champlaigne, gets hysterical at being the only one not winning at a machine, or when she bemoans about how she is too stupid to live.

One moment that I think sums her up well is when the bar is cheering and she comes in and doesn’t know what is going on and she tells them that if they don’t tell her what is going on she is going to cry. That to me just sums up how fragile and damaged she becomes.

I think Rebecca was arguably the most well developed character across the 11 series as she was the only one who really changed. When we first see her she is like Lilith a cold, powerful strong woman. However where as Lilith keeps her cooly, intellectual persona not only throughout Cheers but all of Frasier too, Rebecca by the end of series 6 just becomes a mere shell of her former self and Alley is able to make the tragic story of this woman having a complete mental breakdown seem hilarious to the viewers, largely through her natural talent as a physical comedienne.

Cliff Clavin

Cliffie is one of my favorite characters. I often felt you are not sure of what to make of his character. At times he seems like a complete moron such as during his attempts to become a stand up comedian which ends in unmitigated disaster. At other times he seems like a total lunatic such as when he believes that Adolf Hitler is living in his building. And there are even times it feels like (to me at least) that he is actually aware that all of his ridiculous little known facts are nonsense such as when Frasier corrects him about knuckle cracking and he demonstrates complete awareness that his theory about it was nonsense. This suggest he is just making all of his insane theories up for a laugh and winding the rest of the bar up, making him the ultimate troll. All of this of course helps to make him one of the best characters in the show.

The only thing I don’t like about Cliff is how horrible the other characters are to him. At times it can actually feel a little bit sad seeing Cliff constantly be made to feel left out and made fun of by everyone. Cliff often does not deserve the vile treatment he gets, in fact Cliff is often actually quite nice such as when Paul feels left out and Cliff buys him both a cake and a pizza to make him feel welcome in Cheers. Thus it can feel a little bit sad to see such a nice man be mistreated so horribly.

Norm Peterson

Cheers most loyal customer (despite never paying for his drinks). Norm is probably the character of Cheers that has entered into popular culture the most even more so than Frasier. Everyone knows Norm and the way everyone shouts NORM every time he enters the bar.

Norm always came across as a very likable character because he was definitely the most down to earth and easy going member of the gang. He didn’t have Sam’s extreme vanity, Carla’s bitterness, Frasier, Diane or Lilith’s pomposity, Woody and Coach’s simple nature or Cliff’s insanity!

Often he would be the straight man to many of the other characters OTT nature.

One of the most famous aspects of Norm’s personality was his relationship with his never seen wife Vera. Though Norm often made many remarks at poor Vera’s expense when it truly mattered he came through for her such as the wonderful moment where he threatened to make John Hill a pretzel unless he apologized for being mean to her.

Coach Ernie Pantuso

Coach who sadly only appeared in three seasons due to Nicholas Collasanto’s passing was one of the shows most likable characters. Much like Sam he was friends with everyone in the bar due to his sweet, kind and caring nature.

The episode that I think really demonstrates what a wonderful character he is is the second episode of the entire series “Coach’s Daughter” where we see him persuade his daughter not to marry her awful fiance just to settle.

His relationship with Sam was very well balanced as though Sam was obviously more intelligent, Coach was still older and in some ways still wiser than Sam. Also the fact that they had a history with one another during Sam’s baseball days further helped to add to their closeness.

Woody Boyd

Coach’s replacement Woody was initially just a young Coach. In one episode the man who had owned Cheers before Sam believes when he first meets Woody that Woody is Coach’s son. However as time went on I felt that they made Woody into so much more.

The fact that he was younger allowed them to take his relationship with Sam in a totally different direction. Where as Sam had looked on Coach as being a mentor in some ways, with Woody it was the reverse and Woody was more like a younger brother to Sam. Some episodes even saw Sam become jealous of the much younger Woody.

Woody I think really came into his own when the character of Kelly was introduced. Woody and Kelly centric episodes are always really good because they are such a sweet couple who often wander completely unaware into absolute disaster or fall victim to a cruel manipulative third party such as Kelly’s own father or Henri.

Dr Lilith Sternin

Frasiers one true love (in Cheers at least). Lilith much like Frasier himself was a character who was completely made by the actor who played her. Originally just intended to be a one time bad date of Frasiers, Newirth made such an impression and had such a great rapport with Grammer that they would have been mad not to bring her back.

Lilith is actually my favorite female character in the series. Its brilliant the way she is just so cold, logical and emotionless and the few times we see her emotions emerge its always so awkward and just plain weird. Such as her sobbing when Frasier leaves her or her laughing at Cliff’s bad jokes.

I think her friendship with Cliff is often not mentioned enough in reviews and retrospectives of Cheers. I loved the way that she and Cliff ended up getting along because she was the only person in the bar, nay the entire planet earth who found his awful jokes amusing.

Lilith despite her robotic personality had an incredible sex appeal. This was one of the great ironies of her character despite her completely repressed and emotionless nature she had an incredible libido and sex life.

The character of Lilith would go on to appear as a major recurring character on Frasier which would see her and Frasiers relationship develop further.

Carla Tortelli

Oh dear here we come to my least favorite character in Cheers. In fact Carla is the only character I dislike from Cheers. Now in all fairness I think that Rhea Pearlman was excellent in the role, but the problem was how Carla was written.

She was portrayed as a totally unsympathetic, nasty piece of work with virtually no redeeming features. She would be better in a British sitcom with other unsympathetic characters, but in an American sitcom alongside characters like Frasier and Coach she seems horribly out of place.

Her treatment of Cliff just made her seem like a nasty school bully that you hoped someone would put in their place. The moment where Lilith humiliates her in season 11 and threatens to smash her teeth in if she ever makes fun of her again is one of my all time favorite moments in anything. I do like the way like all bullies Carla doesn’t say anything back to Lilith the first person who finally stands up to her.

I think Carla can be okay when she plays off of the right characters. Her and Frasier actually were often quite a good pair together. Often with Frasier she seemed like less of a bully as he could hold his own more than Cliff. Also Frasier being the man of science was quite a good match for the highly superstitious Carla. One of my favorite episodes is “Airport 5” where Frasier helps Carla overcome her fear of flying. I always loved the moment where as the plane is taking off Frasier tells Carla if she wants she can hold on to him and Carla grabs onto his face.

Carla should have been in more episodes with Frasier.

Cheers Influence

Cheers is possibly the most influential American sitcom of all time. Its influence can be seen in a number of both American and British sitcoms.

I think in many ways Cheers was the template for the many successful American sitcoms that followed it. The Sam and Diane romance, the two characters who switch between being friends and lovers constantly often to the annoyance and amusement of their friends has been replicated many times to the point where it has almost become a staple of American sitcoms.

Ross and Rachel, JD and Elliot and most recently Penny and Leonard. It should be noted that the creators of many successful series such as Scrubs and The Big Bang Theory have cited Cheers as a huge influence as have many prominent British writers such as Graham Linehan the creator of Father Ted and The IT Crowd.

There are other aspects of Cheers that have popped up in other sitcoms throughout the years however.

For instance Gary, the rival to the main character who is always engaged in petty feuds with the main character has become a staple of sitcoms both British and American since, such as Father Dick Byrne from Father Ted, Will Wheaton from “The Big Bang Theory” and even Kam Winston from Cheers own spin off “Frasier”.

However where I think Cheers biggest influence can be found is the fact that it really laid down what American sitcoms where meant to be. More sentimental and emotional at times even bordering on soap opera style comedies. As I said before that is often the big difference between American and British sitcoms. British sitcoms are often darker and revolves around more unsympathetic characters where as American sticoms such as Friends and Scrubs and The Big Bang Theory revolve around more sympathetic characters and are generally more feelgood. I think it was Cheers that was the one that established that about American sitcoms.

There were a number of other big American sitcoms such as Seinfeld and Married With Children which actually tended to follow the British template more of revolving around more unsympathetic characters like the Bundy’s and George Costanze, but ultimately as good as those two series were it was Cheers that the likes of Friends, Scrubs, and The Big Bang Theory would follow on from, as they kept that same sentimental aspect with more likable characters.

Differences between Frasier in Frasier and Cheers

Now I am a huge fan of the two American sitcoms Cheers and its spin off Frasier. I think both shows are really the cream of the crop of American sitcoms. Even today series like The Big Bang Theory still follow the same basic template that Cheers laid down all those decades ago with Penny and Leonard being this generations Sam and Diane, the odd romance made up of two people who could not be more incompatible.

However one thing I and many other people have noticed about the two series is how different the character of Frasier is across both series. Whilst many of these differences can be explained by Frasier simply being older in the second series, others are flat out contradictions, and so I thought just for fun (and because I am incredibly bored LOL) to draw up a list of the various discrepancies and changes in his character between the two series.

Note: I am not saying that this makes the two series inferior, but I just find it quite interesting how much they ultimately had to change the character when giving him his own series.

Cheers Version of Frasier

  • In Cheers Frasier enjoys watching Sports all the time and even gets into a heated argument followed by a race to see who gets to go to a sports game first.
  • In Cheers Frasier also loves playing practical jokes. He is the victim of one in season 3 with the Snipe hunt, but he enjoys it and takes it in good humor saying being pranked makes him feel like he was one of the guys, and later pranks the rest of the gang. Many see this as the moment that Frasier really became friends with the Cheers gang. He also plays many other pranks on people throughout the series including Sam, Cliff, Carla (whom he pranks when she believes her deceased husband is trying to contact her) and on one occasion the entire gang when he helps Cliff play a prank about a frozen head.
  • In Cheers Frasier enjoys drinking beer all of the time.
  • In Cheers he is able to make new friends very quickly and is also able to be friends with people who are completely different to him like Norm, Cliff, Paul, Woody, Sam Malone and even Carla.
  • In Cheers Frasier loves science fiction and horror movies. He offers an incredibly deep analysis (like the type you’d read on any fansite or magazine) of classics such as ET, Invasion of the Body Snatchers and Forbidden Planet. He also even enjoys watching schlocky horror movies such as the low budget one Rebecca’s sister stars in. He is also a fan of Star Wars and considers it on a par with Citizen Kane and Murder on the Orient Express.
  • His attitude towards the women in his life is very intense. He tends to fall very hard for one woman and devotes his entire existence too her to the point where if she leaves him he loses his mind. When Diane leaves him he suffers a complete mental breakdown, becomes a raging alcoholic for a whole year, gives up his profession and ends up working as a janitor in Cheers and even pulls a gun on Sam. When Lilith leaves him he fakes a heart attack, calls her a slut and threatens to kill himself in public to try and stop her from leaving. He is only seen in two very long term relationships as a result of this throughout the series.
  • It is implied that he came from a very wealthy background. Mentioning his family fortune at one point and his fathers pet Owl that he used to go hunting with.
  • Other than her affair, Lilith and Frasier are shown to have a happy marriage, though she is the dominant of the two of them, their relationship is still very close.
  • His father it is mentioned in one episode is a research scientist and dead. He says that originally he wanted to be an actor, but his father insisted that he join psychiatry. Frasier refused at first, but it was only after his father died that he realized it was his true passion which led to feelings of regret over his relationship with his father.
  • His mother is portrayed as a cold, possibly unstable woman.
  • He gets into fights with people at Hockey matches in one episode and overpowers Sam a professional athlete in another and ties him up.
  • After Diane leaves him he makes it known regularly how much he hates her. He frequently gets into arguments with her at Cheers, makes fun of her, joins in Carla’s verbal insults of her and at various points even comes close to attacking her physically.
  • He regularly breaks his ethics and shares some of patients most intense secrets with the gang for laughs.
  • He loves dogs and owns one as a pet in season 3.
  • His apartment is a very plain and barely decorated abode.

Frasier in Frasier

  • In Frasier he hates sports to the point where he can’t even sit through one Basketball game in order to bond with his father.
  • He hates beer and can’t drink it.
  • He can’t stand practical jokes. He considers them beneath him and regularly falls for them and can’t take them and can rarely carry them out properly. His father attempts to tell him being pranked makes him one of the guys, but he never sees it that way and just sees them as being mean.
  • He is often unable to make friends who don’t share his interests. Though he does have a few ordinary friends such as Roz, most of the time his only friend is his brother Niles.
  • His father is alive and a retired cop. This is actually explained in the show where Sam shows up and Sam mentions this to Martin after which Frasier says he had had a fight and Martin hung up and called him a stuffed shirt and that’s why he told people Martin was dead. “what did he say about me the old man the cop.” “He told me you were dead Martin”. “You’re a cop, you told me he was a research scientist” “you were dead what did it matter.”.
  • His desire to become a psychiatrist came from his mother who was a psychiatrist rather than his father.
  • At no point is it mentioned that he ever wanted to be an actor, though he is known to have had an interest in the theatre.
  • His mother is regularly described as a sweet, loving woman who always found something to like about someone.
  • He is afraid of any physical confrontation with anyone, though there are two occasions where he attacks two people who provoke him. One who sits in his chair and another who corrects his French prounciation.
  • His devotion to his ethics is so strong that when he violates them he feels sick to the point of nearly vommitting.
  • His attitude towards the women in his life is very different. He is never able to make it work with one woman. He will often deliberately ruin a relationship with a woman who is potentially perfect for him by picking out a minor flaw in her and being driven mad by it. Thus as a result of this he is never in a relationship that lasts longer than 3 weeks in his own series.
  • He comes from a working class background with his father being a blue collar cop.
  • He loathes science fiction and horror movies and looks down on them greatly, considering it a tragedy that one of his favorite Shakespearian actors is forced to star in a science fiction series.
  • He despises dogs and even has dreams where he murders his fathers dog Eddie and takes any opportunity he can to get rid of him.
  • In Frasier his marriage to Lilith is frequently said to have been unhappy and miserable. “Niles you forget I lived with Lilith I can live with anything”.
  • In Frasier it is said that he never let it be known to Diane how much pain she made him feel when she left him at the Altar, to the point where when Diane writes a play based on her experiences at Cheers, her Frasier character is civil to her and says he holds no ill will towards her. The last time Diane met Frasier in Cheers he grabbed her intensley to the point where he hurt her, and when she said he was hurting her he screamed in her face “AND YOU NEVER HURT ME!”
  • His apartment in Frasier is lavishly decorated to the point where leaves Daphne a diagram when she cleans it to make sure that she doesn’t mess up his decorating style. “Askew Daphne ASKEW!”

As you can see the Frasier in Frasier is in some ways almost the complete opposite from his Cheers incarnation. Again however some of these discrepancies can be explained. For instance the reason he can never make it work with a woman in Frasier could be seen as a result of his negative experiences in Cheers. Also his inability to make new friends in Frasier is addressed many times in Frasier. There are episodes that show him revert to his Cheers persona. The most notable example of this is in season 5 in the episode “Where Every Bloke Knows Your Name” where he starts attending a bar and is shown to become friends with ordinary people like his friends back in Boston and even starts drinking beer and indulging in activities like playing darts that he would normally look down upon with Niles.

Others however like his attitude towards Diane and his dislike of dogs are just flat out contradictions,  but hey in the history of a character who lasted 20 years there are bound to be continuity errors.

Why I prefer the 11th and the 12th Doctors to the 10th and 9th Doctors

Now before I start I want to make one thing clear. I do not hate either the 9th or the 10th Doctors. Indeed I love the entire Russell T Davies era, and David Tennant and Christopher Eccelston where every bit as good in the role of the Doctor as any of their predecessors or successors.

However I feel that overall the 11th and 12th incarnations of the Doctor have been better realized than either the 9th or the 10th Doctors because of how they were written and more importantly because the actors playing them were given considerably more freedom in the role.

I’d say that the first four Doctors and 11 and 12 are the best realized Doctors. 5, 6, 7 and 9 and 10 meanwhile all suffer from similar problems which I will explore in this article.

Of course I don’t expect everyone to agree with me on this as 9 and 10 are both deservedly very popular. However this is what I feel was wrong with these two incarnations of the Doctor despite their many great qualities which obviously overshadow the negative ones.

1/ The 9th and 10th Doctors were too much like other heroes

Now when Russell T Davies brought Doctor Who back to our screens in 2005 American sci fi and fantasy had pretty much cornered the market. Russell even says so in the leaflet for the 2005 series box set.

Thus Russell decided to make the new Doctor Who more like these American series in order for it catch on.

You can see a lot of series like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Xena the Warrior Princess and even Smallville in Russell’s era of Doctor Who. It should be noted that Russell T Davies was also a huge fan of these series anyway.

“Joss Whedon raised the bar for every writer not just genre/niche writers, but every one of us.”

Russell T Davies on Joss Whedon and Buffy’s influence on his career.

I don’t mind Russell taking inspiration from these series. Its no worse than Hinchcliff taking inspiration from old Hammer movies.

However I think Russell went a bit too far in taking inspiration from these series in that he actually made the Doctor a bit too similar to heroes like Angel and Xena.

Barry Letts for instance made the third Doctor a bit of a pastiche of heroes like James Bond and Jason King. However he didn’t go too far. The third Doctor still seemed like the Doctor. He didn’t go around seducing all of his female companions like Bond or shooting people all the time (the Ogron in Day of the Daleks whom he gunned down aside of course).

Sadly however like I said Russell I feel just simply went too far in making the Doctor like heroes such as Xena and Angel.

Xena, Angel and The Ninth Doctor are all characters who have done horrible things in the past and are now in some ways trying to make up for them. All are conflicted, dark, moody, angsty heroes who end up falling in love with a little blonde, inappropriately young teenager, Buffy, Gabrielle and Rose who holds back their dark side and makes them into better people.

This story arc of course continues on into the Tenth Doctors era.

The ending of Journeys End where we see the Doctor tell Rose that she made him a better man is total Xena/Gabrielle Buffy/Angel crap.

As is the ending of Doomsday where we see Rose and the Doctor trapped in different universe. Its not to dissimilar to Buffy and Angel being trapped in different universes at the end of Buffy’s second season finale.

The 11th and the 12th Doctors meanwhile I felt where closer to the Doctors from the classic era. Whilst there were moments where 11 was written out of character such as his constant flirting, by and large he seemed more alien and unconventional than either 9 and 10. You certainly couldn’t say he was an angsty 90’s anti hero like Angel or Xena.

Even the romance they gave him with River was more unconventional. 10 and Rose’s romance is very Buffy and Angel or even god forbid Bella and Edward. Obviously its better written and acted than Bella and Edward, but it is along the same lines. An ancient immortal with a dark nature falls in love with a teenage girl and their relationship has bad consequences for both, whilst at the same time she helps to temper his bad side. That description fits more or less Buffy and Angel, Bella and Edward, Xena and Gabrielle and The Doctor and Rose.

Thus 11 and 12 I felt were superior as unlike 9 and 10 they were the Doctor. They didn’t feel like the Doctor doing an impression of other characters. Now you might think that all of the other Doctors are different so what does it matter. However whilst all of the Doctors are different I think there are certain qualities that help link them all together. Sadly 9 and 10 I feel are just too different because they are actually modelled on other characters.

2/ The 11th and 12th Doctors costumes and look were more in tune with the older Doctors

Again you might say all of the Doctors costumes and appearances were different anyway. However again I would say that whilst they are all unique all of the Doctors costumes and appearances all have similar qualities to them that help link them all together.

All of their costumes have a certain Victorian and Edwardian feel to them, or are at the very least old fashioned. They are all somewhat over the top and completely unconventional too.

Also the Doctor I feel should have somewhat longer or at the very least bigger hair. That’s one of the more unusual things about his look. He takes so much care about his clothes but he often just lets his hair grow out. The 1st Doctor, 5th Doctor, 6th Doctor, 7th Doctor and 8th Doctors all had long flowing hair, whilst the 4th and 3 Doctors had a big mop of curly hair. Even the second Doctor had big unmanagable hair.

Now as you can see the 9th and the 10th Doctors don’t look like the Doctor at all. I mean they really don’t.

The 9th Doctor has an ordinary leather jacket, the Tenth Doctor wears sand shoes. And look at their hair! The 9th Doctors is shaved whilst Ten’s is gelled up like Jedward.

They just don’t look like the Doctors. They stand out like sore thumbs when you put all of the Doctors together.

The ninth Doctors costume I think is very like Angel or Spike from Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which again fits in with the Buffy influence.

The Tenth Doctors costume meanwhile I think looks more like one of the guys from the dickhead song video on youtube here.

I think both cases represent Russell T Davies trying to make the Doctor modern and trendy. Hence why he makes the ninth Doctor look like Spike and the Tenth Doctor look like in Colin Bakers own words “someone Kate Moss would date”.

The 11th and the 12th Doctors meanwhile are dressed much more like the older Doctors.

11’s costume is much more old fashioned, unconventional and is a bit Holmesian. I think I preferred his second costume the most.

12’s costume meanwhile also is I feel more old fashioned and though it is toned down, its still a bit Byronesque.

Also even their hair is more Doctorish. 11 has the quiff and whilst 12’s is short its not shaved or gelled up like one of the dickheads.

11 and 12 despite 11’s youthful appearance both just look like the Doctor. They don’t stand out from the others the way 9 and 10 do.

3/ The 10th and 9th Doctors were too inept

Now this is a bit of a problem I have with the Russell T Davies era is that the Doctor is too weak in it. I am not saying that the companion should be a damsel in distress. Far from it, but the Doctor is the central character and therefore should not be a passenger in his own series.

The ninth Doctor saves the day twice in his only series. The tenth Doctor meanwhile starts out with a much better record, but as time goes on he does become a bit more ineffective. The worst is in Journey’s End where Donna gets his powers and uses them much better than he does and even tells him he is useless compared to her!

In contrast the 11th Doctor is a much more useful Doctor all around. He only fails to save the day in two stories of his first season and his second season. However in his third year he does get pushed to the side I will admit a bit too much in favor of Clara such as in The Name of the Doctor. I also feel the 12th Doctor has been pushed to the side a bit too much such as in Death in Heaven where he does literally nothing!

Still I think sadly 9 has to take the prize for the most inept Doctor of them all. In fact not only does he fail to save people a lot of the time, but he actually makes things worse. Like look at The Unquiet Dead 9 does nothing but get a young woman killed!

4/ The 9th and 10th Doctors were too human

Now this is a problem I have with these two Doctors is that they didn’t seem alien enough. The Doctor is supposed to be an alien remember. In the classic era as different as the many Doctors were they all seemed alien. You’d never see the Doctor express overt human emotion. He never broke down in tears, screamed hysterically or blew up. The only time you saw him react that way was in The Twin Dilemma when he was insane. Other than that the Doctor was never someone who you would expect to react like a human being. That’s not to say he showed no emotion whatsoever, but it was often understated.

The 9th and the 10th Doctors meanwhile I feel always reacted like a human being would. We always saw 10 break down in tears, lose his temper, scream all over the place. 9 whilst not quite as human as 10 was still a bit too much of a conventional hero.

Now 11 could be quite emotional too, such as his speech in The Rings of Akhatan or his break down over losing Amy and Rory. Again compare 11’s reaction to losing Amy and Rory and 10’s to losing Rose to 5’s reaction Adric’s death.

However I still found 11 to be more convincing as an alien than either 9 and 10. Other than the odd emotional outburst 11 generally tended to react to things much like the 4th Doctor, in that he would often have an over the top reaction to something completely mundane, yet be quite cold to something important to us.

In Lets Kill Hitler he gets excited when he is dying at the thought of Fish Fingers and Custard, whilst in The Girl Who Waited he ruthlessly left the older version of Amy to die. Thus 11 was a much more unpredictable character.

12 meanwhile is definitely the most alien and cold too. Like 11 he is also a very unpredictable character. Whilst I do not like Kill the Moon I do feel it offers quite an interesting insight into the Doctors character by showing him react to a situation in a completely different way to his human companion. In 12’s mind he does nothing wrong by leaving Clara to make her own decision. Ironically he thinks he wasn’t pandering to her, whilst Clara saw it the exact opposite way and felt he was treating her like a child.

11 and 12 are overall much more alien characters.

5/ The actors who play the 11th and 12th Doctors are given more freedom

Now this I think could be the most important factor in why I prefer these two Doctors. I think the Doctor is a role where the actor should be given more freedom.

Thats why the first 4 Doctors are better realized than the last 3 for this very reason. I feel that the actors were allowed to really become the Doctors.

The first Doctor is essentially William Hartnell. Director Waris Hussein even said this remarking that Hartnell often wasn’t acting when playing the first Doctor. Similarly the 4th Doctor is just Tom Baker. Hell if anything he is a restrained Tom Baker.

Now obviously I am not saying that the actor should be allowed to take over the show. I think that happened a bit too much towards the end of Tom’s time.

However the actor should have a lot of say so in how his character is portrayed.

This was a problem with all 3 80’s Doctors. I don’t think any of them were given as much say in how their Doctors were portrayed. Colin for instance famously wasn’t allowed to pick his costume. Neither in fact were Sylvester McCoy or Peter Davison all of whom wished to have those annoying question marks removed.

Now Eccelston and Tennant I feel were similarly not given as much freedom. Russell T Davies picked out both of their costumes and according to Eccelston virtually everything about the 9th Doctor was decided by Russell. Even 9’s use of the word Fantastic was apparently something Russell used to say all the time.

Matt Smith and Peter Capaldi however were both given considerably more freedom. When you look at an interview of Matt Smith, whilst he’s not entirely like his Doctor obviously, you can tell there is more of him in the role. Also Matt and Peter were allowed to pick their own costumes too. The famous Bowtie came from Matt not Moffat.

Thus whilst I think every actor in the role has been great 1, 2, 3, 4, 11 and 12 I think are the better realized on screen, In the Big Finish Audios I think Peter Davison, Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy and Paul McGann are given the freedom that the first four actors were given and I hope one day Tennant and Eccelston will be too if Big Finish ever gets the rights to produce Big Finish audios based on the new series, though its doubtful Eccelston will ever return to the role.

Conclusion

Hopefully you can see that 11 and 12 were closer to the original Doctors than 9 and 10 were. I think the person to thank for this is really Steven Moffat.

I think Moffat understands the character of the Doctor better than Russell T Davies. This is not to say that Russell is a bad Doctor Who writer, but I think that Moffat ultimately just gets what it is that makes the Doctor unique.

He understands that the Doctor is alien, old fashioned, unpredictable, and best of all that the actor playing the role should really be allowed to throw himself into the part and thus he stood back when he had to.

Top 10 Paloma Faith Songs

I was lucky to discover Paloma Faith right at the very beginning of her career. Normally I am the last person to discover anybody, but Paloma was the exception. I remember when I was practically the only person I knew who owned her album, of course nowadays that certainly is not the case.

Its been quite nice over the last 5 years seeing recognition for Paloma become greater with each one of her 3 albums, “Do You Want The Truth Or Something Beautiful”, “Fall To Grace” and “A Perfect Contradiction” having been more successful than the last.

Paloma seems all set to become a national institution any time soon and its not hard to see why. She is a unique, imaginative and very special talent with a huge, captivating personality.

Now obviously this article will be looking at what I believe are her 10 best songs, and is not meant to represent anyone’s opinions but my own. As always let me know what you think in the comments below.

10/ Upside Down

A very fun song from her first album. Its not as deep and poetic as many of her later efforts, but its still a great track none the less. It has a very 40’s feel to it. You could almost imagine someone like the Andrew Sisters singing it. That’s one of the best things about Paloma’s music is the real sense of good old fashioned fun to it, which I think is reflected in Upside Down better than any other song.

9/ Stargazer

Another song from her first album. Stargazer I think it demonstrates what makes Paloma’s music stand out from her contemporaries. Stargazer conjures up absolutely beautiful, vivid and even surrealist imagery. “He circles Haley’s comet lights up the sky like a flame”. The song overall can be seen as example of Paloma’s over the top and eccentric imagination. Paloma has often been compared to the likes of Amy Winehouse and Adele. Its not hard to see why as obviously all three are very talented, soul singers who sing very real and relatable songs.

However where Paloma is different and stands out from them is that I feel her work is more imaginative. Where as Amy’s are more gritty and dark, Adele’s are more sombre, Paloma’s are definitely the most whimsical and offbeat and I really don’t think any song demonstrates that better than Stargazer, which contains some of Paloma’s most creative lyrics.

8/ Picking Up The Pieces

The first song on her second album. Picking up the Pieces is a bit more of a straight forward break up song, about being in a relationship with someone who still can’t get over their ex. Its not quite as offbeat as some of the stuff on her first album. Though the video where we see Paloma as a melting mannequin certainly is! Still I would rank this as one of my favorites anyway as Paloma’s vocals on it are particularly strong.

7/ Only Love Can Hurt Like This

Paloma’s highest charting single to date. Only Love Can Hurt Like This is a very strong power balled. Much like Picking up the Pieces this song is really made by Paloma’s vocals. She captures the nuance and pain of the powerful lyrics beautifully.

6/ Trouble With My Baby

This quick paced song from Paloma’s latest album is the perfect contrast to many of her slower, more thoughtful pieces. This song takes us into it right away and is fast and fun. The video as well also features a running gag in Paloma’s videos where she murders someone. This can also be seen in the video for Smoke and Mirrors where she chops a man in half.

5/ Black and Blue

A very thoughtful and incredibly deep song about the differences between people as well as the similarities that bind us all together. The song makes a point about how no one person can have it all, “I know a rich man who has everything you could ask for. Except children.” The song points out that no matter where you get to in life you will still go through periods where you feel sad, lonely, desperate and miserable, but that you will not be alone as everyone at some point also endures it. Regardless of your beliefs or status. Its part of what makes us human.

4/ Do You Want The Truth Or Something Beautiful

The title track of her first album is a very powerful and moving song about how sometimes it can be better to live a lie than face the truth, which is sadly something that I think we can all relate to at some point in our lives. The song benefits from both its beautiful and poetic lyrics and Paloma’s vocal performance which is somewhat more understated, but still effective. I think the video for this song also demonstrates Paloma’s talents as an actress too as we see her switch between the happy lying persona and the miserable true one.

3/ Never Tear Us Apart

This cover of the song by Australian rock group INIX I feel is Paloma’s strongest cover song. Her powerful, emotive and soulful voice is perfectly suited to the song. I think this cover was a bit overlooked, though it was used in a John Lewis advert. Its no doubt due to how beloved the original is that this cover isn’t given the due I feel it deserves. Still I think at the very least this cover matches the original if not surpasses it.

2/ Stone Cold Sober

Paloma’s debut single. This song has I think feels almost like a Bond theme at times. It has a real sexy 60’s feel to it yet at the same time also a somewhat modern sound too. Paloma is a master at being able to blend different genres as well as sounds from different era’s together wonderfully and you can see see that here in her first ever single perfectly. The song also demonstrates Paloma’s more theatrical nature both in its vocals and composition.

1/ New York

An oldie but a goodie. To me this is Paloma’s masterpiece. It has all the hallmarks of a truly excellent Paloma track. It has wonderful, poetic, imaginative lyrics “the wolves they howl for my lost soul”, strong vocals, a wonderful sweeping composition that benefits Paloma’s more theatrical nature and performance. Finally it also manages to really evoke an old fashioned sound too. This feels like the type of song that’s always been here. When you listen to it you think “I am sure I have heard someone else do that”, but then you read the booklet of the CD and you see it was actually Paloma who wrote it.

Finally this song also has a special significance for me as it was the first Paloma song I ever heard. I remember seeing it on a music channel. It was only the tail end of it, but it looked promising and so I looked it up on youtube and have been a devoted fan of Paloma ever since.

Individual Dalek Characters

The Daleks were originally intended to be faceless drones by their creator Terry Nation. However over the years as many other writers have added their own unique take on the Daleks, we have been introduced to a number of very different individual Dalek characters, across many different mediums.

In this article I will be taking a look at all of them. The Daleks who saw the light, the mutated or rather even more mutated Daleks and the homicidal or again even more homicidal Daleks, as well as some of the most unique Dalek Variants the show has produced over the years.

Hopefully this may show some of you who feel that the Daleks are boring and one dimensional that you can actually make a Dalek into a more 3 dimensional character. You don’t always need to bring in Davros to stand in for them.

There are a number of very different and interesting characters in this list as you will hopefully soon see, all of whom have helped add a fresh dynamic to the monsters over the years.

Zolfian and Yarvelling

Now I wasn’t sure whether or not include these two characters as I suppose they are not technically Daleks. They are members of the humanoid race whom the Daleks evolved from in the comic book series “The Dalek Chronicles”.

However I have decided to include them here anyway as the race they belong too is still called Dalek. I wont be including Davros and Nyder as though they are also members of the humanoid race that predated the Daleks, there is I feel more of a clear distinction between their race and the Daleks as their race is referred to as Kaled (an anagram of Dalek).

Thus these two though they are humanoid are still technically Daleks, so therefore I will be including them.

Zolfian and Yarvelling appear in the first “Dalek Chronicles” strip Daleks: Genesis of Evil. This story which was printed in the 1960’s marked the first time anyone had ever tried to tell the origin of the Daleks in any medium.

The “Dalek Chronicles” were written by David Whitaker, though this issue in particular was written by both Whitaker and Alan Fennell. It would later be hugely contradicted by Genesis of the Daleks.

The issue depicts the Daleks as originally blue skinned, bald, squat, humanoid creatures simply called Daleks.

They were locked in a war with the Thals who lived on a different continent to them. Zolfian was the Daleks leader who sought to use a radiation bomb to destroy the Thals, whilst Yarvelling who was their leading scientist was planning to create a new war machine to eradicate them.

Ultimately however a metiorite storm strikes the city and sets off Zolfian’s bomb causing the Dalek city to be engulfed in radiation and the Dalek race to be seemingly wiped from existence. Only Zolfian and Yarvelling are able to survive in the War council chamber where they remain for two whole years. Eventually however they decided to leave, to search for more Daleks and to see if any Thals have survived so that they can finish them off.

When they emerge from the chamber they discover a few Daleks did survive the blast, but have been horribly mutated and are now housing themselves in Yarvelling’s war machines.

What Yarvelling created to destroy the Thals, has now become the Dalek race’s only hope. The first of these mutated Daleks asks Zolfian and Yarvelling to construct more war machines to house the other mutated survivors. They agree and are able to build a Dalek war machine production line as well as a special casing for the first Dalek who confronted them who declares himself the emperor. Zolfian and Yarvelling however soon die of radiation sickness. The Daleks meanwhile still need more casing built and being unable to build it themselves soon seek out other life forms to build them for them. According to the story this is where the Daleks desire to dominate other life forms begins. As they need them to build their war machines for them.

Obviously this origin story is no longer considered canon after the events of Genesis. There are still a number of fans however who have tried to work it into canon.

Zolfian and Yarvelling’s design was inspired by the Meekon, Dan Dare’s archenemy.

The Mekon also inspired the design of Davros the other creator of the Daleks too, according to Philip Hinchcliff in an interview which you can watch on the Genesis of the Daleks DVD.

Dalek Zeg

Zeg has the honor of being the first proper Dalek to be given a name. He appeared in the “Dalek Chronicles” strip “Duel of the Daleks”. He was originally a Dalek inventor but after an accident in his lab he was mutated into becoming virtually indestructable. His mind was also affected too, to the point where he could experience emotions such as joy that were alien to the Daleks. His casing was also turned bright red as a result of his mutation.

Zeg soon tried to take control of the Daleks from the Emperor himself.

The Brain Machine a computer that the Daleks look to for advice suggests that Zeg and the Emperor duel to determine who is the master.

The Emperor tries to destroy him with acid and mercury, but eventually manages to eliminate Zeg with liquid nitrogen.

Zeg marked a huge turning point in the development of the Daleks. It marked the first time we saw a Dalek develop its own personality and desires. Though Zeg was a far cry from the later more benevolent individual Daleks of the revival, he still can be seen as their forbear in some ways, as he is a Dalek who experiences human emotions and turns on other members of his kind.

The One In A Million Dalek

Now this Dalek who also appeared in the “Dalek Chronicles” is the real precursor to all of these benevolent Daleks that we see in the new series. Dalek Sec, Dalek Caan and Rusty.

The One in a Million Dalek like Zeg becomes mutated, but unlike Zeg he develops compassion and affection, to the point where he even appreciates the beauty of flowers.

He begins collecting them and actually decorates himself with them, much to the disgust of his fellow Daleks, particularly the Emperor.

This story allowed us to see a whole new side to the Daleks. Not only did we get to see a benevolent Dalek for the first time, but we also got to see just how twisted the regular Daleks were as well.

Its disturbing to see how the Emperor doesn’t just simply kill the one in a million Dalek. He could easily, but he wants him to see first that his new way of thinking is wrong. He wants him to see that the beauty of the flowers decays, that it is not as strong as the hatred of the Daleks.

It shows us how for the Daleks exterminating their enemies is not enough. They must prove to their enemies that their way of thinking is superior. They must destroy everything that their enemies have ever believed in. Only then will they feel that they have truly won.

This helps to explain the Dalek camps in many ways. A lot of the time we see the Daleks keep their humanoid victims alive for months, years, even decades in these death camps. Sometimes they do use them for slave labour, but on other occasions there is seemingly no point to keep their victims alive. Their main goal is to exterminate all other non Dalek life forms why would they bother keeping millions of them alive?

However we now know why. Its because they are trying to break them, trying to prove to them how inferior they truly are, for experiencing emotions like love, compassion and pity.

Thus the One in a Million Dalek helped to flesh the monsters out in more ways than one.

The Emperor

Now I wasn’t sure whether to include him as he isn’t really a character. There have technically been five different Dalek Emperors throughout the years. The first emperor in Evil, Davros the creator of the Daleks himself, Nick Briggs Big Finish Emperor, the time war Emperor and finally the Emperor in City of the Daleks. There is also a 6th Emperor in the Dalek Chronicles.

However even with that I feel that the Emperor over the years has been somewhat more fleshed out than other Dalek leaders such as the Dalek Supreme’s.

The Emperor in David Whitakers Dalek Chronicles was certainly an individual character more so than the other Dalek leaders we were used too.

In Nations early 60’s Dalek stories the Black Daleks were no different, except for their higher ranking than his followers. The Emperor in Whitakers comics however had his own desires, his own petty grievances and wishes which might not always gel with his followers ironically.

David Whitaker really helped flesh the Daleks out more than any other writer. In doing so however he did take away from their alien nature. Nation had deliberately made them all faceless drones to emphasize their inhumanity and it proved very effective on a number of occasions such as most notably in Genesis of the Daleks.

Thus though the Daleks lost a lot of what had made them so effective and even unique through Whitakers stories. He still nevertheless added so much to their characters overall and is probably the most influential Dalek writer of all time.

Sadly when the Emperor appeared on screen in the story The Evil of the Daleks he was nothing like the character from Whitakers comics. He was just simply another Dalek Supreme, only bigger. He of course looked fantastic and his voice sounded superb, but he wasn’t really much of a character.

Nicholas Briggs fortunately would draw on the Dalek Chronicles for influence when producing his excellent Dalek Chronicles series and gave us an Emperor who was more of a well fleshed out character than the one in Evil.

Briggs also gave him a more distinctive voice. I liked the voice for the Emperor in Evil, but it did just feel like a loud Dalek. Briggs was able to inject a certain pomposity and sense of arrogance and even real pride into his Emperor’s voice.

Briggs Emperor seems like a creature who considers himself above all other life forms, even fellow Daleks.

When the Emperor made a proper return to our screens in 2005 for the season 1 finale The Parting of the Ways, Russell T Davies really changed his character like never before.

This Emperor was completely insane. He saw himself as a god and declared the destruction of earth to be his heaven.

I always felt that Russell T Davies based this Emperor on John Hurt as Caligula from “I Claudius”.

“I Claudius” was one of Russell T Davies’s favorite series growing up, in fact he has said that it was the show that made him want to get into television the most after Doctor Who itself.

You can see “I Claudius’s” influence very clearly in Davies’s interpretation of the Master. Davies’s Master is driven insane by the constant drumming in his head, which is also how Hurt’s Caligula is driven mad too. Both also go on to be crazy despots as a result of this as well.

I feel that the Emperor of the Daleks is just as comparable to Hurt’s Caligula. They are both insane emperors who see themselves as gods. Hurts Caligula’s death is similar to the Emperor’s as both believe they’re attackers who can easily dispatch them cannot as they do genuinely see themselves as gods. They both see however how wrong they are in their final moments.

Briggs does as an excellent job as the insane Emperor. He keeps the same sneering, arrogance of his emperor from the Audios, yet adds a real hysterical, erratic quality to the character that really helps to make him seem like a complete and utter lunatic even by Dalek standards.

Davies’s Emperor also gets many memorable moments with the 9th Doctor such as the famous “Coward or Killer” scene which many feel helps to define the ninth Doctors character.

Whilst he may have been portrayed as just another generic Dalek leader at times, when done right the Emperor actually has potential to be one of the shows most interesting individual villains.

Alpha, Beta and Omega

Now these three Daleks Alpha, Beta and Omega appeared in the Second Doctor story The Evil of the Daleks.

They marked the first time in the series itself that we saw Daleks develop human emotions and turn against the other members of their kind.

Now all of these ideas had been done in the Dalek Chronicles before hand. What made these three Daleks original however was that this was the first time we got to see these types of Daleks interact with the Doctor himself. The Dalek Chronicles did not feature or even reference the Doctor at all. Thus none of its individual Dalek characters got a chance to meet their archenemy.

Here however we get to see these Daleks actually become friends with the Doctor, who is even the one to give them names. This of course offers up a wonderful new take on the monsters relationship with the Time Lord. Showing him actually attempt to help them for once, something which would later be picked up on in the Tenth Doctors era.

These three humanized Daleks would later go on to appear in an 8th Doctor comic strip The Children of the Revolution where we see that they have come to view the Doctor as their saviour. He freed them from being mindless, evil drones, unable to experience anything but hate. Thanks to the Doctor they could experience all of the beautiful and wonderful things in the universe that we often take for granted. They no longer feel driven to destroy, they can live their lives in peace and actually experience happiness.

In a way this makes you pity the Daleks. It shows you how each individual Dalek drone has no say in what it is. They are all just conditioned to be monsters, but they miss out on so much. Its not even like the Cybermen as the Daleks do still have emotions, but its only negative emotions, hate, anger.

Imagine being only able to feel these poisonous emotions and feeling them every second of every day. It would be a living nightmare. Thus it makes sense that these three Daleks see the Doctor as their saviour for he allowed them to escape from the horror that was their existence before hand.

Special Weapons Dalek

Now this Dalek isn’t really an individual character. Its more a variant, but since it is such an unusual variant I still feel I have to include it. This Dalek as you can see is like a cross between a tank and a Dalek. Its virtually indestructable and can blow up about 50 Daleks at once. According to spin off material its fire power it equivilent to 100 Daleks.

I think this type of Dalek has been criminally underused over the years. It has actually only made one appearance on television since its debut in Rememberance of the Daleks in 2012’s Asylum of the Daleks where it made only the tiniest cameo.

With all the many appearances of the Daleks in New Who I really don’t know why the haven’t brought this guy back more often. I would have loved to have seen him the Stolen Earth/Journey’s End during the Dalek invasion.

Test Subject Dalek

This Dalek only appears in the audio story The Genocide Machine opposite the 7th Doctor. This Dalek is downloaded with all the knowledge of the library of Kar-Charrat, the largest library in the universe.

Initially the Daleks hope to use this Dalek as a weapon, but it soon turns on them. Whilst this might seem like a retread of the one in a million Dalek idea, I feel that they are able to present this idea in quite an interesting fresh way.

This Dalek develops a conscience because due to its intelligence it comes to see things in a more logical way. Even though ironically the Daleks often look at solutions to problems in a logical way, they themselves  are anything but logical creatures.

They are driven purely by an irrational, emotional hatred and fear of other life forms. This new Dalek however abandons their way of life as it can see how foolish it is. How foolish it is to waste so many Daleks and resources on pointless wars with other life forms, many of whom would never have even come into contact with the Daleks anyway.

It can also see that it is logical to preserve life in the universe, that all life is unique. And that it is the worst thing imaginable to waste potential, which the Daleks do all the time, not only in the people they kill in their wars. But also in all the Daleks they get killed in their own wars. All of whom are geniuses and who could have given so much more to the universe than just designing more weapons. Think of all the potential that gets wasted every time a Dalek drone gets destroyed. As the Ninth Doctor said each Dalek is a genius it can calculate a billion combinations in less than a nano second.

If the Daleks were not consumed with their hatred they would probably be as great a civillisation as the Time Lords.

This is a key difference between the Daleks and the Cybermen. Though they are both conquerers the Cybermen who are purely logical beings want to preserve life. They want to upgrade all other life forms into Cybermen. They believe that logically they will be helping all other life forms as they will be ensuring that they never die, and never have to deal with the pain that emotions can bring. Thus even though they are villains in their own strange way they are not truly evil. They are merely trying to preserve all life in the universe in their own way by upgrading it to its next stage.

The Daleks however who are illogical and evil simply destroy. They don’t try and preserve.

Thus the test subject Dalek simply cannot ally itself with the other Daleks and ends up even saving Ace the Doctors companion from them in an effort to preserve life.

It was quite a nice twist to see a purely logical being look on the Daleks as irrational, emotional creatures. Often people just tend to think of the Daleks as robots who rely on pure logic, but this story and character I think reminded people that they were actually flesh and blood creatures underneath with actual emotions.

Dalek X

This Dalek appears in the Tenth Doctor novel “Prisoner of the Daleks”. It is without doubt one of my favorite Dalek characters.

Dalek X is the Dalek Inquisitor General. He is feared by every Dalek bounty hunter across the universe. Apparently Dalek X is not his real name, but he merely adopted it to inspire fear in humanity.

Dalek X is different to other Daleks in that he actually enjoys causing pain. Daleks are ruthless, but they are not sadists. They don’t enjoy hurting their victims as joy is a completely alien concept to them. Dalek X however somehow is able to take pleasure in his victims suffering.

Its a brilliant twist that a Dalek can adopt human qualities, but rather than positive ones like love and compassion its negative aspects that we have such as actually taking a pleasure in someones suffering that ironically Daleks don’t have.

This is seen when brutally tortures the Tenth Doctor in many different ways seemingly just for the fun of it. At one point whilst torturing the Doctor he remarks that he just wants to see how much pain he can inflict on the time lord.

The end of Prisoner of the Daleks sets up a potential future appearance of Dalek X, which sadly hasn’t happened yet.

Personally I would love to see Prisoner of the Daleks adapted for tv. I think it would actually fit Peter Capaldi’s 12th Doctor better than David Tennant’s 10th Doctor to be honest. The 10th Doctor whilst a great Doctor obviously didn’t have that same burning hatred for the Daleks that 12 has. He was trying to control his darker impulses. That was the point of his character coming after 9.

However imagine seeing 12 face the most evil and sadistic Dalek in the cosmos. That would be an amazing confrontation. I would also like to see Rusty added to the story. Again imagine Rusty the Dalek who hates Daleks vs the most evil of all Daleks.

Sounds to good an idea to miss to be honest.

As much as I love David Tennant (who doesn’t?) the Doctor with those angry, angry, angry, angry eyes would definitely be a much better match for Dalek X.

Metaltron

The first Dalek of the new Who the Metaltron as he was dubbed believed himself to be the last Dalek in existence. The Metaltron allowed us to see the Daleks in a whole new light. Here we saw a Dalek that was insane as it couldn’t believe that it was the last of its kind.

The idea of being the last of your kind would be enough to drive any life form insane, but its even worse with a Dalek. It goes against everything they believe in. Their whole function is to be the master race, the rulers of the universe. Thus the idea of being the last of the Master race who have become extinct is of course contradictory and it drives the metaltron insane.

The Metaltron later becomes infected with humanity which again is an old idea, but here it is shown to be more tragic for the Dalek.

Alpha, Beta and Omega all embraced their humanity and saw the Doctor as their saviour for freeing them. However unfortunately the Metaltron is unable to do so. He considers his humanity a contamination and a sickness and eventually commits suicide rather than face it.

I love how in his final moments with Rose we can see the look on her face changing from initially sympathy to utter disgust when the Dalek states that it will not be inferior like her.

The Metaltron remains one of the most compelling characters in the whole history of the show. His interactions with the Doctor were truly fascinating to watch, and the fact that they were both (seemingly) the last of their kind allowed them play off of one another in a way no Dalek, or indeed enemy of the Doctor had been able to with the time lord before.

The Cult of Skaro

The Cult of Skaro appeared in 6 episodes of the revival. Of all the Daleks in this list they were by far and away the most well developed. We saw members of the cult go from typical ruthless Dalek leaders to desperate creatures struggling to survive to insane prophets to unexpected heroes.

The creatures were a fairly interesting idea. They were a group of Daleks who had been given individual names and personalities in order to think like the enemy thinks and devise new ways of killing.  They consisted of a Black Dalek Supreme named Dalek Sec and three other standard Daleks, Dalek Caan, Dalek Thay and Dalek Jaast.

In their first appearance it is obvious from the start that these Daleks have more personality even before we find out who they are, as demonstrated by Dalek Secs hilarious and cutting remarks towards the Cybermen.

Their personalities are looked into in more depth in their next appearance Daleks in Manhatten/Evolution of the Daleks. Here we see how Sec is able to recognize that in some ways other life forms are superior to the Daleks such as human beings.

Sec is in many ways a reverse Davros. Davros was the creature who dragged the Kaled race down and turned them into monsters. Sec is their one chance for redemption. He is a one off. A Dalek who can think like the enemy thinks, but is actually compassionate enough to want to help them. All other Daleks who have seen the light hate the Daleks. Alpha, Beta and Omega tried to exterminate them, as did the test subject Dalek, whilst the Metalron was so disgusted at having human feeling it killed itself.

Sec however is the only one who actually could have helped them. In the Tenth Doctors words he is the one creature who could have “lead them out of the darkness” and actually allowed them to feel and choose their own destiny’s rather than blindly follow some path Davros laid out for them.

The fact that the Daleks destroy him over some petty feud just goes to show how beyond hope and how ultimately tragic they are. It also serves as quite a nice parallel to Davros at the same time who was also killed in a similar fashion to Sec in Genesis, with both ironically trying to convince the Daleks to show mercy.

When Dalek Caan appears again in Journey’s End we see him finally think like the enemy thinks and see the Daleks for what they really are. However unlike Sec, Caan knows that they are beyond help and so he destroys them.

The Cult of Skaro story arc was one of my favourites in Doctor Who. I found them to be very interesting characters. Though of the two of them Sec and Caan were the only two who really had any development. They were still among the most interesting Dalek characters in the shows history.

Stone Dalek

Now again this isn’t really a character more of a variant. Its character is just the same as any Dalek drone it kills things. The only difference is that it looks way more cool. To be fair though it does look really, really cool and is certainly one of the most creative Dalek variants there has been over the years.

I think the stone Dalek could only have really worked in the Steven Moffat era. The Moffat era was obviously more whimsical and surrealist than other era’s of the shows history. The idea of being erased from time turning you into stone is really more of a fantastical idea than a science fiction one, but it works in the Moffat era as it is more of a fantastical take on Doctor than most other era’s and so therefore the Stone Dalek works too.

Oswin Dalek

Yet another good guy Dalek. Oswin was featured in Steven Moffat’s classic Asylum of the Daleks. Oswin is different to the other good guy Daleks in that she was once a human being who was captured by the Daleks and turned into one of them.

This was not the first time we saw a Dalek turn on the other members of its kind. Or indeed the first time we saw human beings be transformed into Daleks. However it was presented in quite a new and interesting way where we see Oswin throughout the story and believe that she is a human being only to discover at the end that she has been hallucinating this whole time that she is still a human being.

Its a truly horrifying moment when we discover the truth and just see a Dalek sitting there talking as though it were still a human being.

Its probably Moffat’s best twist as I really did not see this coming.

Rusty

The star of the latest Dalek story Into the Dalek, Rusty is yet another Dalek that has turned against the rest of its kind. However with Rusty its one again in a different way.

Other good guy Daleks are usually Daleks who have developed human feelings such as compassion and therefore hate the other ruthless Daleks.

With Rusty however he does not actually have any compassion or mercy or pity he just simply hates the Daleks the same way that they hate other life forms.

He is still every bit as evil and pitiless as regular Daleks its just that he now hates creatures of evil.

The best part however is that his hatred for the Daleks comes from the Doctor himself.

The 12th Doctor attempted to link his mind with Rusty, but unfortunately the Dalek was unable to comprehend any of the Doctor’s positive qualities. It could only see his hatred, his hatred for the Daleks and it loved it. It embraced it and turned on its own kind.

The scene where it obliterates the squad of Daleks who ironically had come to rescue it in cold blood whilst a horrified Doctor stares realizing that Rusty has done this in his name is one of my favourite moments in all of Who.

In many ways Rusty does what the Doctor would love do. Exterminate every single Dalek he see’s. He is the living embodiement of the Doctors dark side in this scene the Doctor can see what his own anger and hatred is capable of like never before.

I so hope to see Rusty again some time. I think they would be mad not to bring him back for future appearances, there is so much potential in his character.

Lumpy

This character appeared in the most recent online game The Doctor and the Dalek featuring the 12th Doctor. Lumpy it seems to me is nothing more than a stand in for Rusty. I don’t know why they wouldn’t use Rusty for this game. I am hoping that its because they are saving him up for something much bigger on tv in season 9.

Whatever the case Lumpy is really just Rusty lite. He is another Dalek who turns on the rest of his kind, is given a funny nickname by the 12th Doctor and helps him battle Daleks and Cybermen and Sontarans too.

Whilst there is nothing particularly original about Lumpy’s character, its still quite a neat idea for a story. A good guy Dalek and the Doctor fighting his worst enemies across time and space. Its almost like a surrealist buddy cop movie.

Steven Moffat said he apparently originally thought up the idea for Into the Dalek for a video game, but decided that it would be better for a tv episode. I kinda wish he had done the same for this game as well. I would love to have seen this as perhaps a Christmas special.

I suppose Lumpy, Rusty, Alpha, Beta and Omega all of whom are still alive could maybe form a super hero team. Using their Dalek powers to fight crime across the universe.

THAT would be a fun idea for a Doctor Who video game.

As you can see there have been a lot of weird and different Dalek characters throughout Doctor Who. There have been many interesting types of heroic Daleks and exciting variants over the years. Anyone who says that the Daleks are just simply one dimensional monsters should take this into consideration. Not only have there been a lot of interesting new takes on them throughout the years, but there have been a lot of interesting Dalek characters too.

Daleks vs Cybermen

The Daleks and the Cybermen are the Doctors two most iconic enemies.

Though the Doctor has had many colourful and imaginative rogues over the years. None have even come close to matching the recognition and overall iconic status of the Daleks and the Cybermen.

Its even more impressive when you consider how old they both are. The Cybermen were introduced in 1966 in the first Doctors last ever story “The Tenth Planet”, whilst the Daleks were introduced in the second ever Doctor Who story “The Mutants”.

So why is it that these two in some ways ridiculous looking, clunky, 60’s monsters continue to reign supreme? Both terrifying and captivating children in the 2010’s just as much as they did in the 1960’s?

Well I think its because the Daleks and the Cybermen despite their larger than life qualities appeal to a very real fear unlike other monsters.

The Daleks represent man’s inhumanity to man. They capture all of the very worst aspects of human nature. They despise others simply for being different. They have a total disregard for their environment to the point where they believe they can destroy it or shape it to any way they wish. They unleash devastating weapons that can erase an entire civilisation in the blink of an eye.

The actions of the Daleks in certain stories incredibly enough can even be seen to parallel those of actual people. The Daleks plan to exterminate the thals by poisoning the environment with radiation is similar to the British’s attempts to use agent Orange to destroy communist insurgents crops during the Malayan Emergency in the 50’s. Their attitude towards the Thals meanwhile, viewing them as nothing more than insects that need to be stamped out evoke the horrifying views of some of the most evil men throughout human history, including Herman Goerring and General Chivington.

Finally the images of the Daleks rounding people off the streets and herding them together like animals are also reminiscent of images that we see from the second world war of the Nazi’s rounding people out of their houses and into death camps and ghetto’s.

Whilst they may look like just silly robots on the surface underneath the Daleks are a powerful metaphor for race hatred, the threat of nuclear power and genocide.

The Cybermen meanwhile play on our fears that technology that was once supposed to help mankind will eventually turn in on us.

Now this is a common trope of sci fi. One of the most prominent examples being The Terminator film series. However I would argue that the Cybermen are a much more effective example of this trope than even The Terminator. The Terminator shows us humanity being overrun by intelligent machine’s. The Cybermen meanwhile show us humanity actually becoming those ruthless machine creatures. Thus the future with them in it is more bleak.

In The Terminator version of the future there is always a chance, and even if we do eventually lose to Skynet, we still die as human beings. With the Cybermen however not only is their no hope, as we have transformed ourselves into machines, but we also completely lose our humanity too.

The Cybermen also play on an age old fear of being turned into a monster. This idea has terrified human beings since practically the beginning of recorded history. Vampires, Zombies, Werewolves, Ghosts they are monsters who all start out as human just like the Cybermen. The Cybermen are merely this idea brought into a science fiction environment.

The idea of losing our humanity, our personalities, memories, everything we believe in and becoming just a member of a faceless hive mind, and being forced to do things that we would normally find abhorrent, including even harming our loved ones. Is an idea that will always terrify human beings whether it is with the Cybermen or Zombies.

Thus it is for these reasons that I feel that the Daleks and the Cybermen still stand head and plunger above all of the Doctors other many wonderful enemies.

However which of these two sci fi icons is better?

Well I can’t answer that for sure obviously as it is entirely a subjective question. Still however I am going to look at both monsters side by side and try and judge who has had the better stories, who has done more harm to our dear old doc, who has more impressive weapons and who has beaten who more times etc.

As always all opinions here are only my own and let me know who you prefer in the comments below.

1/ Who Has Done More To The Doctor

Now both the Daleks and the Cybermen have been responsible for quite a number of tragedies in the Doctors life throughout the years which has also helped to contribute to their status as the Doctors main enemies.

However who has done more?

Well its undoubtedly the Daleks.

The Cybermen were responsible for the death of the First Doctor. They didn’t kill him directly, but they were the final straw. They wore him down. They also were responsible for the death of his companion Adric, whom they actually killed directly. They also were partly responsible for him losing Rose and they also turned both Danny Pink, the man Clara loved, and the Brig his oldest and dearest friend into Cybermen. Though both were ultimately able to fight their control.

The Daleks however have been responsible for the deaths of 4 Doctors. The 8th Doctor whose ship crashed in the time war, the War Doctor who was worn down by fighting them for so long, the 9th Doctor who had to absorb the time vortex from Rose who had only absorbed it to stop them. And finally the 11th Doctor who was also worn down in their war on Trenzalore.

In addition to this they caused him to lose another regeneration during the Stolen Earth with Handy. They also were responsible for the deaths of two companions, Sara Kingdom and Katirina in the classic era. In the new who meanwhile the Daleks destroyed his home planet and caused him to lose Rose and Donna. Though the destruction of his home planet was later undone, its still lost because of them.

Thus the Daleks have ultimately down more to the Doctor over the years. The Cybermen have caused him an awful lot of shit, but the Daleks really have to win this round

Daleks 1 Cybermen 0

2/ Who Has Better Stories

Now this is the most subjective. Personally I think the Daleks have far better stories overall than the Cybermen. I think there are only 3 Dalek stories that are not either all time classics or minor classics at least. Planet of the Daleks, Destiny of the Daleks and Daleks in Manhatten/ Evolution of the Daleks, and even then I wouldn’t call any of them poor.

However the Cybermen I think have only four major classic stories. Tomb of the Cybermen, The Invasion, Earthshock and Rise of the Cybermen/Age of steel. There are a few other Cybermen stories I would rank as minor classics, and no truly terrible stories except for Dark Water/Death in Heaven.

However that is just my opinion of course.

Still I think the vast majority of Who fans and even mainstream viewers if you were to ask them would say that the Daleks have better stories.

The Dalek stories have always been a bigger hit with viewers. Genesis of the Daleks is the most repeated story of the Classic era. Journey’s End meanwhile marked the first time that Doctor Who had managed to reach number 1 in the viewing figures.

Genesis has also often been voted as the greatest Doctor Who story of all time and is usually in the top ten, if not top five at least. Both Power of the Daleks and the Evil of the Daleks have been voted the greatest Doctor Who story ever made as well on different occasions.  No Cyberman story has ever been voted the best story ever made in any major poll. To be honest the only Cyberman story that usually makes the fans top ten lists is Tomb of the Cybermen and it is normally ranked below Genesis, which normally isn’t the only Dalek story to crack the top ten. Rememberance of the Daleks and Dalek are normally in the top 10 as well.

Thus whilst I can’t speak for everyone, overall I think its safe to say the Daleks stories are at the very least more celebrated than the Cybermen’s.

Daleks 2 Cybermen 0

3/ Who Has Done More To The Companions

Strangely enough I am going to have to give this one to the Cybermen. The Cybermen haven’t met anywhere near as many companions as the Daleks. In the Classic era the Daleks only didn’t meet 6 companions. Dodo, Zoe, Liz, Leela, Adric and Mel. Even out of those they only haven’t met Adric and Liz in spin off material. They have met every companion in the revival meanwhile.

The Cybermen on the other hand only met 15 companions in Classic Who, whilst they also sadly never got a chance to meet either Martha Jones or Donna Noble or River Song.

Still the Cybermen have managed to inflict more pain on the Doctors loved ones than the Daleks.

The Daleks caused Victoria to lose her father, Jack to become a cursed immortal, Rose to be trapped in a parallel universe, and Donna to lose her memory of the Doctor as well as the deaths of Sara Kingdom and Katirina.

The Cybermen however first of all caused the death of Adric. Unlike either Sara or Katirina, they actually killed him directly. Also they caused the death of Martha’s cousin, and Danny Pink the man Clara loved to come back as a monster, and Rose to be trapped in an alternate universe, and if you count the Brigadier as a companion they also brought him back as a Cyberman too. They also caused Rose to see her own mother get turned into a Cyberman. Though it was in an alternate universe its still a pretty horrible thing to happen.

Overall I’d rank this as being much worse than what the Daleks have done to the Doctors loved ones. Unlike with Katarina and Sara Adric was killed directly by the Cybermen. It wasn’t just on an adventure with the Cybermen that he died. They made him stay on a crashing space ship and the Doctor was unable to save him.

Also whilst Donna did lose her memories she still had a happy life. She got married and won the lottery! Similarly Rose eventually got her own Doctor too. The Brig however is still a Cyberman, flying through space on his own as a machine, Clara still has the memory of Danny’s rotting corpse brought back as a Cyberman.

Actually the Daleks have done a lot of nice things for the Doctors companions ironically. After all it was because of them that Susan met David the man she loves, Ian and Barbara found a way back to their own time, Mickey found an alternate reality where his grandmother still lived (as they were the ones who tore down the barriers between realities) and though they may have ripped Rose screaming from the Doctor. They also are the ones who caused her to get her Doctor clone too. They shot the Doctor creating the whole meta crisis in the first place, and they broke the barriers between realities down allowing Rose to enter our world, this also allowed Mickey to cross over into our reality where he met his wife Martha Jones! Even Captain Jack becoming an immortal has at various times been both a good and a bad thing for him.

So yeah by and large the Daleks have unintentionally done a few nice things for the Doctors companions over the years. They’ve helped them get home, get superpowers and even find love.

With the Cybermen however its all been nothing but misery so they definitely win this round.

Daleks 2 Cybermen 1

4/ Who Is Scarier

I am going to also have to give this to the Cybermen. Now again this is also purely subjective, but still I think most people, at least those that I have spoken to find the Cybermen more unnerving.

Look at it this way all the Daleks can do is kill you. Well okay they can also force you to work in a Dalek camp or turn you into a roboman. Still the Cybermen slowly remove every single part of your body and replace it with a mechanical component, transforming you into a cold, unfeeling machine. You’re awake throughout all of it and you have to watch as chunks are ripped out of your flesh and your humanity is removed in every respect.

Thus the Cybermen are scarier in that the way they kill you is just so much more fucking horrible.

Also I think its true what Neil Gamian said that the Cybermen were always scarier because in the 60’s at least they hardly ever said anything. They were just silent, you had no idea what was going on in their heads, as they also obviously had no facial expressions either. The Daleks however were bombastic and loud and aggressive always shouting at the top of their voices how angry and at times scared they were.

Nicholas Briggs the voice of the Daleks and the Cybermen in the new Who has said that he always found the Cybermen to be much scarier.

Now Nicholas Briggs is the biggest Dalek fan on the planet! Nobody loves or I think understands them as well as old Nick, but even he has to admit that the Cybermen are more frightening. Like Gaiman he said that they were scarier because they were so quiet. The Daleks he said he found fascinating, but the Cybermen genuinely terrified him.

Many actors who worked with both monsters have often said that they found the Cybermen far more frightening than the Daleks. Nicola Bryant who played Peri, Sophie Aldred who played Ace and Andrew Hayden Smith who played Jake Simmons have all said that the Cybermen scared them more on set than the Daleks.

I had a recurring dream as a child that I think was inspired by the scene in the Colin Baker Cyberman story Attack of the Cybermen where Lytton is captured. I was climbing up a ladder like Lytton and then a Cyberman grabbed my foot and pulled me down. I remember struggling so hard, but the Cyberman’s strength just was just virtually limitless so it pulled me down right away. I can also remember being so scared at being cornered by the Cyberman as you just know there is nothing you can do. You can’t fight it. Its not like a Zombie where you can shove it off, a Cyberman is a big towering, mountain of steel, and there is no way you can reason with it either. After they caught me they then dragged me away to their conversion chambers and I remember not only being placed in them, but also seeing other people beside me in them too.

Some of them were half way there into being Cybermen, but still had enough humanity left to have a look on their face of unimaginable horror. Others who had only just begun the process were screaming to be let out and the Cybermen only responded with an emotionless stare. I can also remember looking down at my hands which had now become metal and unfeeling.

Needles to say this dream always disturbed me and even made me afraid to go to sleep! I can’t imagine the Daleks ever inspiring that same kind of fear in someone. Like I said all the Daleks can really do to you is just shoot you like a lot of villains, with the Cybermen its much worse than that, so yes the Cybermen win this round for me.

Daleks 2 Cybermen 2

5/ Who Has Caused More Destruction To The Universe

This one has to go to the Daleks. The Daleks have destroyed billions of worlds across the entire universe. They have in fact threatened every universe and in their second ever appearance they managed to conquer the earth and drive humanity to the very brink of extinction.

The Cybermen aren’t in the same league as the Daleks when it comes to blowing things up. To start with until Nightmare in Silver in 2013 they were never able to convert non humans and thus were only ever a threat to humanity. On top of that they never ever actually managed to conquer the earth too. The Daleks did that in their second ever appearance and have done so many times since. Day of the Daleks, Bad Wolf/ The Parting of the Ways (where humanity numbers 98 billion) and The Stolen Earth/Journeys End.

The Cyberman’s track record for causing pain and death is quite frankly embarrassing compared to the Daleks. Daleks definitely win this round.

Daleks 3 Cybermen 2

6/ Best Weapon Of Mass Destruction

For the Daleks this is the Reality Bomb a weapon that can destroy ever single universe and is powered by stolen planets! For the Cybermen its the Cyberking a Godzilla sized robot that can convert billions of people into Cybermen in a second.

Both of these superweapons were devised by the twisted genius of Russell T Davies, but which is better?

Well again i am going have to say the Daleks here. I love the Cyberking. It is so badass its not true. However you can’t really top the reality bomb. I mean it can destroy everything literally. Hence its name the Reality Bomb, plus the fact that it is powered by stolen planets its also just too badass for it not to take the lead.

Daleks 4 Cybermen 2

7/ Best Pets/Servants

For the Cybermen this is the Cybermats, the Daleks it is the Ogrons. Now the Cybermats are probably more iconic than the Ogrons. However I am sorry I have never found the Cybermats remotely scary. In fact I thought they were quite cute. The Ogrons however were intimidating. That bit where the soldier turns around in Day of the Daleks and just sees one standing over him before it clobbers him is a very effective and frightening moment.

Daleks 5 Cybermen 2

8/ Best Leader

The Cybermen take this one for me. The Cyber leader played by David Banks in the 80’s had much more of a personality (ironically enough) than any of the Dalek supremes except for Dalek Sec of course. Still even then David Banks gloriously hammy and evil Cyber Leader will always have a special place in my Whovian heart.

Daleks 5 Cybermen 3

9/ Best Overlord

Now this is a hard one as I do love both the Cybercontroller and the Emperor of the Dalek. However I am going to have to give this to the Daleks. The Emperor is much more of a character. His comeback in the Eccelston era was also much, much better than the Cybercontroller’s comeback in the Colin Baker era. Plus the Emperor actually caused the death of a Doctor too. Emperor definitely takes this.

Daleks 6 Cybermen 3

10/ Best Creator

The Daleks definitely win this. John Lumic the creator of the Cybermen was entertaining, but Davros is one of the greatest villains of all time. He is a true Who icon and has been the star of some of the greatest Doctor Who stories ever made. Plus he is far more bat shit mental too.

Daleks 7 Cybermen 3

11/ Best Home

Now I am going to give this to the Cybermen. The Dalek city is obviously a very impressive set, however the Cyber tombs on Telos are a truly iconic set piece and something that really sticks in your head.  I don’t think there’s any Whovain who will really forget the image of the Cyberman emerging from their tombs to the classic music.

Daleks 7 Cybermen 4

12/ Best Surprise Cliffhanger

This one I am going to have to give to the Cybermen too. The Daleks best surprise return was in Army of Ghosts when we think its the Cybermen who are going to emerge from the Sphere only to be greeted with 4 Daleks. The Cybermen’s meanwhile is in Earthshock when we discover who is behind the mysterious androids and it zooms out to reveal the Cybermen. Now both are classic Doctor Who moments, but the Dalek one was somewhat spoiled by the next time trailer which revealed a Dalek gun shooting someone leading to widespread speculation that they would return before the episode aired. The Cyberman one however was kept completely under wraps by JNT. Also the Cybermen hadn’t appeared for 7 years at that point. I sadly don’t think the Daleks could ever have a cliff hanger as amazing as Earthshock as they are used so frequently. At this rate it would be a huge shock if they didn’t pop up in at least one story per year.

Daleks 7 Cybermen 5

13/ Best Good Guy Member Of Each Race

Now there have actually been a few good guy members of both races. However the one I am going to choose for the Cybermen is Kroton a character who only appeared in comic books and was briefly a companion of the 8th Doctor and for the Daleks, Rusty.  Now as for who I think is better well I am going to have to give this to the Cybermen. I love Rusty and I think he has potential to be a great recurring character, but Kroton was a brilliant character. I think its a shame he has never crossed over into television, but he is still one of my fave Whoniverse, spin off characters. He helped save the entire mutliverse from the Master, all Rusty did in Into the Dalek was zap a few Daleks.

Daleks 7 Cybermen 6

14/ Best Killing Of A Main Character

In The Stolen Earth the Daleks murder Harriet Jones in cold blood. In Earthshock the Cybermen forced Adric to remain on a spaceship as it crashes into the earth and the 5th Doctor is unable to save him in time.

Both are powerful, poignant moments, but again I am going to have to go with the Cybermen here.

Harriet dies a heroes death. She defies them to the end and dies getting the Doctor there which ends up saving every universe.

Adric’s death is much more horrible as his death is utterly meaningless. He dies trying to save humanity from the Cybermen unaware that if he actually succeeds in stopping he ship from crashing he will wipe humanity from existence. He also dies thinking he failed to saved earth the home planet of one of his best friends and stands there alone, knowing that he failed to save billions of innocent people and worse that the Doctor failed to save him.

Compare their last words to see the difference.

“Oh you know nothing of any human and that will be your downfall”

“Now I’ll never know if I was right”.

The Cybermen definitely gave a main character a much more horrible death, so they win this round.

Daleks 7 Cybermen 7

15/ Who Is More Powerful

Okay for the finale round lets take a look at which of these two abominations is the strongest. Now I could debate for hours about it by bringing up all of the badass things they have done and comparing them side by side, but there is a much easier way.

Instead I am going to look at all of the times they have actually fought and measure up who has had more victories against the other.

Lets get stared shall we.

Round 1/ The Ultimate Adventure

The first time the Daleks and the Cybermen ever met was in the stage show, Doctor Who the Ultimate Adventure which starred Jon Pertwee and later Colin Baker. The version starring Colin Baker was later re made by Big Finish Productions.

In this play the Daleks work with the Cybermen to destroy the earth. However the Doctor later reveals to the Cybermen that the Daleks are planning to frame the Cybermen for the destruction of earth to the Time Lords, leading to an all out battle between the two races on Skaro.

Sadly we don’t know who the winner is however as the Doctor flees Skaro before we see who wins, so we will have to call this a draw.

Round 2/ The Battle of Canary Wharf

The Daleks and the Cybermen met for the first time on screen in the two part season two finale of the revival. Army of Ghosts/Doomsday. It was the battle Who fans had been waiting for for 40 years.

However sadly it couldn’t really be called a battle as the Daleks completely fucking thrashed the Cybermen. The Cybermen meanwhile weren’t able to scratch the paint on the casing on one of the Daleks.

It gets worse when you consider that for most of the fight the Daleks have only 4 members, whilst the Cybermen have 5 million.

Also the Cybermen end up working with the Doctor himself who gives them advanced weaponry that can hurt the Daleks and even with this the Daleks still fucking thrash them, and they don’t even manage to hurt one Dalek. Eventually once the Dalek army is unleashed they begin slaughtering Cybermen all over the world and the Cybermen become so desperate they try to flee to their own universe!

Its one thing to flee a planet from an enemy or even to the end of this universe as the Master did when he faced the Daleks in the Time War, but to flee this plane of existence itself is really fucking embarrassing. Ultimately before the Daleks can completely wipe the Dalek race from existence the Doctor manages to pull both armies into the void.

However I think that we can still give this to the Daleks. Poor Cybermen were really outclassed in every way here.

According to spin off material the Cybermen did manage to kill one lowly Dalek drone by luring it onto the ground and ripping its head off. However that’s one Dalek compared to the millions of Cybermen that the Daleks killed.

Yeah this is definitely a Dalek victory.

Score/ Daleks 1 Cybermen 0

Round 3/ Daleks vs Cybermen GAME

This on line game is set in an alternate universe to the main Doctor Who universe. It features an alternate version of the events of Doomsday. Here the Cybermen are more of a match for the Daleks and in the game you play as the Cybermen fighting the Daleks. Once you kill the black Dalek the Daleks are defeated and the Cybermen claim the earth as their own.

I suppose technically you could also count this as a Dalek victory, depending on how good a player you are. If you lose then obviously the Daleks win and the Cyber race is exterminated. However the proper story of the game see’s the Cybermen win which means this is a Cyber victory.

Score/ Daleks 1 Cybermen 1

Round 4/ Doctor Who Live

The two races met again in another Doctor Who live tour, starring Matt Smith in special pre recorded scenes. At the end of the story the 11th Doctor releases the Cybermen with the sole purpose of destroying the Daleks who have cornered him. The Daleks have the upper hand at first but the Cybermen eventually thrash them. Its a total reverse of the Battle of Canary Wharf as here the Daleks are utterly humiliated as they retreat into their OWN weapon that they had hoped to trap the Doctor in to escape the Cybermen. The Cybermen finally get back at Dalek Sec for telling them they are better at dying, not that Cybermen care about revenge, a petty human emotion anyway.

Score/ Daleks 1 Cybermen 2

Round 5/ The Doctor and the Dalek

The two races would clash again in the most recent online game The Doctor and the Dalek featuring the 12th Doctor, with Peter Capaldi even reprising his role. The premise sees the Doctor work alongside a good guy Dalek named Lumpy to try and stop the Daleks, Cybermen and the Sontarans from obtaining pieces of a time lord weapon that will allow them to rule the universe. You play as Lumpy and battle Daleks, Cybermen and Sontarans. Now Lumpy is able at one point in the game to defeat several Cybermen by himself on their home planet of Telos even when his power is low. The Doctor doesn’t trust him to have full power so Lumpy is only able to stun the Cybermen. Still he manages to beat them. So the Cybermen lose to a half functioning good guy Dalek on their home turf. Pretty humiliating defeat, though at least Lumpy doesn’t rub it in like Sec did

Score/ Daleks 2 Cybermen 2

Round 5/ Siege at Trenzalore

All of the Doctors worst enemies gather for a big royal rumble at Trenzalore. Daleks, Weeping Angels, Cybermen, Slitheen, Tereliptiles, Zygons, Sontarans, Silence, Ice Warriors, Silurians and even the Mara. In the end however only the Daleks remain. All the others either “burn or flee” though the Daleks are eventually defeated by the 11th Doctor, they still last a lot longer than the Cybermen making this yet another victory for the Daleks making the final score

Score/ Daleks 3 Cybermen 2

This also makes the finale score overall

Daleks 8 Cybermen 7

Therefore the Daleks are the winners overall

It was very close but ultimately I find the Daleks to be the better villains. The Daleks were always my fave villains as a child. They were the reason I got into Doctor Who as a child in the first place. So yes I guess it makes sense that they will always be my faves.

The Doctors Interactions with the Daleks

The Daleks are the Doctors most recurring foes and the only one of his many enemies to date who has battled every single incarnation of the Doctor on screen.

Whilst the Daleks have always remained effective villains of the Time Lord, it is true that certain incarnations of the Doctor have played off of the monsters much better than others.

This can be for a number of reasons. Some Doctors just aren’t as well suited to the villains, others meanwhile don’t get a chance to interact with them as much.

In this article I will be looking at which Doctors were the best Dalek Doctors. This does not reflect which Doctors were the best overall or even which Doctors had the best Dalek stories. Just simply which Doctors suited the pepperpots from Skaro the best.

We will also be looking at what each actor who played the Doctor thought of the Daleks.

1st Doctor and the Daleks

The first Doctor I felt was one of the best matched for the Daleks. Its just as well considering, depending on how you count them he had more Dalek stories than any other Doctor to date. Though if you count two parters of the revival as two separate stories then both the Tenth and the Eleventh Doctors have more Dalek stories. Either way the 1st Doctor has the most amount of Dalek episodes however.

In fact there are almost as many episodes with the Daleks in the first Doctors era as there are with the Tenth Doctor and the 11th Doctor in total. The 10th Doctor is in 47 episodes, whilst the 11th Doctor is in 44 episodes. Hartnell meanwhile has 42 Dalek episodes. He also has as many Dalek episodes as the 7th Doctor has in total in the series, whilst the first Doctor is in more episodes with the Daleks than the 6th Doctor is in total and finally there are over three times as many Hartnell episodes with the Daleks as 9th Doctor episodes in total..

So yes its just as well the 1st Doctor was a good fit for the monsters.

The great thing about the first Doctor’s interactions with the Daleks is that they really help to define who the first Doctor, and by extension all subsequent Doctors really are.

When we first meet Hartnell’s Doctor he couldn’t be more different from his successors. He is ruthless, selfish, cowardly even murderous. He doesn’t care about the affairs of other life forms, he even looks down on them, calling human beings “primitives” and “savages”.

His morality at first doesn’t seem too different to the Daleks, as he considers himself and Susan above Ian and Barbara because they are human.

However it is when he confronts the Daleks that we first see the changes in his character.

In the first Dalek story “The Daleks”, the Doctor to start with is callous and selfish, perfectly prepared to leave the thals who have been lured into the Daleks city to their fate, and at one point even Barbara too!

However by the end of the story when he sees how the Daleks are willing to destroy an entire culture, even an entire species in the blink of an eye it horrifies him.

Prior to this the Doctor clearly looked on the Dalek/Thal conflict as being no different to the conflict between the cavemen in the previous story. To him its just more silly primitives he considers beneath him fighting with one another and therefore its none of his business. The Daleks however quickly show themselves to be beyond that. They aren’t just having a war with the Thals over land or influence. They hate the Thals with the very core of their being and want to erase them from existence.

The Doctor for the first time is actually morally outraged at what he is seeing and actually takes a more active role in trying to stop the Daleks than he ever thought he would. At one point he is willing to give up the secrets of the TARDIS itself to the Daleks to try and save the Thals.

Within the one story we can see a huge change in the Doctors character due to his dealings with the Daleks. The evil of the Daleks shows him that there are some things in this universe worth fighting against.

Of course the Doctor doesn’t become the hero we all know and love by the end of the first Dalek story. It could be argued that he was only willing to give up the secrets of the TARDIS to save his own life. Also its a long while after the first Dalek story before the Doctor becomes the central heroic character.

Still you can see a very noticable change in his character from this point on. He is certainly no longer as callous, or ruthless as he was before. The Daleks showed him what true evil is and their revolting attitude of considering all non Dalek life forms lesser than them also perhaps made him look at himself more and how he had treated the humans around him whom he considered to be lesser than he was.

Though he and Ian and Barbara do clash again in the following story “The Edge of Destruction” it is worth noting that the Doctor at the start of that story was trying to get them back to earth, something which he was not willing to do before hand.

In the next story “The Dalek Invasion of Earth” we see the Doctor take on a central heroic role for the first time in the series.

Once again he becomes so outraged at what he sees he actually doesn’t rest until he has stopped the Daleks. The Daleks have blitzed an entire planet, slaughtered billions of innocent men, women and children, destroyed an entire culture and society and plan to do the same to billions of other worlds by turning the earth into a spaceship that will make them unbeatable.

In “The Dalek Invasion of Earth” the Doctor is finally recognizable as the character we have come to know and love. He is the hero helping the under dog in any way he can, who never gives up even when everyone else around him wants to.

David/ They dare to tamper with the forces of creation.

The Doctor/ Yes they dare. And we have got to dare to stop them!

After “The Dalek Invasion of Earth” we see the Doctor become involved almost all of the time. After having got involved in stopping the Daleks he finds that he can no longer sit back in any situation. He has discovered who he truly is in his dealings with the Daleks and seemingly what his role is in the universe to help those in need like the Thals and the humans of the 22nd century from monsters like the Daleks.

The Daleks therefore really help to define who the Doctor is as a character during the first Doctors era and that’s what makes his interactions with them so interesting.

Of course I am not saying that all of the first Doctors development from a self serving character to a hero is because of the Daleks, but certainly a large part of it is and I think you can see his development more clearly across his 4 stories with the Daleks than with any of his other stories.

By his final Dalek story “The Daleks Masterplan” the First Doctor is now someone who is willing to sacrifice his own life to stop the Daleks and thinks nothing of it. A far cry from the selfish, callous individual who was willing to let the Thals walk into a trap in the first Dalek story.

The Daleks

The Doctor/ Well, lets get back to the ship.

Susan/ No, I must warn the Thals.

The Doctor/ Susan!

Susan/ We can’t just let them walk into a trap.

The Doctor/ The Thals are no concern of ours. We cannot jeopardize our lives getting involved in an affair that is none of our business.

The Daleks Masterplan

The Doctor/ I want you to give me enough time to get to that meeting and find out exactly what is going on. Then I will head back to Chen’s ship.

Bret/ And how long will that take?

The Doctor/ Well I must leave that to your own judgement. If, of course you hear any kind of uproar, well then you’ll have to get into the spaceship and go off without me.

Bret/ Doctor we can’t leave you.

The Doctor/ Oh nonsense, nonsense. Earth must be warned about the Daleks and Chen.

Bret/ You are a very brave man.

The Doctor/ Rubbish, rubbish my boy. I’m only doing what must be done.

I wouldn’t say the first Doctor’s interactions with the Daleks are the best of any Doctor, but they are definitely among the best. In his time the Daleks do help to shape the Doctor. They show him that he can’t just keep travelling and never get involved in anything around him. The Daleks ironically create the Doctor who never gives up, and always fights against injustice.

Clearly I am not the only one to have this interpretation of the First Doctor’s relationship with the Daleks. In “Into the Dalek” the most recent Dalek story, the 12th Doctor states to the Dalek, Rusty

“I was just running, I called myself the Doctor, but it was just a name. And then I went to Skaro. And then I met you lot and I understood who I was. The Doctor was not the Daleks.”

That to me perfectly sums up the first Doctors relationship with the monsters.

William Hartnell apparently loved the Daleks. He stated in an interview taken between the first and second seasons of the show that he was delighted they would return in the new series. His wife Heather Hartnell would later say how much he loved them in an interview for the 20th anniversary.

“Bill used to really enjoy the Daleks, because they were something for him to hate. In a way they were the real black monsters of the time, because, then, we hadn’t had bad Time Lords brought in. So they were the worst enemy he ever came across and he really enjoyed fighting them and he knew the kids loved the Dalek series.

Despite this however Hartnell later mentioned that he found the Daleks somewhat tricky to work with, as he said it was hard for him acting against an inanimate object. He also apparently didn’t like them being overused stating “I hope we don’t overuse them. I was very clear on that with producers. I told them we must not let the series descend into constant Dalek battles. They must be used sparingly.”

2nd Doctor and the Daleks

For me the Second Doctor could very well be the best Dalek Doctor of them all. Even though he only got two Dalek stories, I still honestly can’t think of a Doctor better suited for his archenemies than the Second Doctor.

The second Doctor’s Dalek stories were written by David Whitaker. Now Whitaker as I have explored gave us an entirely new interpretation of the Daleks. His Daleks were manipulative, physically powerful, able to understand humans and less alien than Nations.

All of this made them the perfect match for the second Doctor.

The Second Doctor was quite a manipulative character. On the surface he seemed like a silly, bumbling oaf, who resorted to a state of childlike panic whenever anything went wrong. However underneath he was arguably one of the most cunning and wiley Doctors of them all.

He often used his clown like facade to throw his enemies like the Cybermen and the Ice Warriors all of whom greatly underestimated him off.

The Daleks in Troughton’s time similarly often manipulated their opponents. In “The Power of the Daleks” the Daleks dupe the human colonists into thinking that they are peaceful and everyone on the colony has no idea what they are dealing with. Only the Doctor knows just how dangerous they are of course.

At the same time however his usual tactics of “oh my giddy aunt” pretending to be a moron and a fool does not dupe them. They know him too and they know how powerful he truly is.

That’s what makes the second Doctors interactions with the Daleks so fascinating. We see these two incredibly powerful creatures, The Doctor and the Daleks, make everyone else around them think they are harmless.

We also see how they use everyone around them including even the Doctors own companions like pieces on a chess board such as when the Doctor goes as far as to risk Jamie’s life in trying manipulate the Daleks in “The Evil of the Daleks”.

This really helped to reinforce the idea of the Daleks being the worst of the Doctors many enemies. All of his usual tactics could work on the Cybermen, but with the Daleks he had to go that extra mile. He was pushed to his very limits in trying to get one over on them, which is why he risks Jamie’s life.

In “Evil of the Daleks” both the Doctor and the Daleks constantly manage to get one over on the Doctor until the Doctor finally beats them. To begin with the Daleks get one over on the Doctor by stealing his TARDIS and luring him across time itself. Then when they force him to isolate the human factor, he tricks them by making the humanized Daleks friendly. The Daleks however manage to trick him again by revealing that the technology he has given them will allow them to isolate the Dalek factor and use it to destroy humanity. They then make him their servant, but he is able to trick them one last time by pretending that they have enslaved him and infecting them with the human factor.

Patrick Troughton generally tends to underplay it when facing the Daleks, a sign that he is genuinely afraid this time unlike with his usual hysterical reactions.

I am not sure how Patrick Troughton’s Doctor would have worked with another take on the Daleks. He really lucked out in that Whitaker’s Daleks were such a perfect fit for his Doctor. For the first time the Daleks actually mirrored the Doctor somewhat, as they both used the same tactics as one another, they were both deceitful, but one obviously used these tactics for good, the other for evil.

Sadly modern generations can’t enjoy the second Doctors interactions with the Daleks properly as only episode 2 of “The Evil of the Daleks” survives with all other episodes having been junked.

Still you should check out the recons on Youtube or the surviving audio tapes to get a glimpse of what are in my opinion the greatest Doctor/Dalek interactions.

Patrick Troughton was very fond of the Daleks too just like Hartnell was. Apparently he even counted “The Evil of the Daleks” among his favorites and near the end of his life offered to remake the serial to the BBC who sadly turned him down.

3rd Doctor and the Daleks

The Third Doctor I feel was not only a very effective Dalek Doctor, but also a very influential one too. He was I think the first Doctor who really demonstrated a hatred for them. The previous two Doctors had obviously been willing to destroy the Daleks, but you never got the impression that they despised them.

With the third Doctor however there were hints that he did despise them. It wasn’t as pronounced as say the 9th Doctor, but still you could see little moments between 3 and the Daleks that were precursors to the likes of 9 and 11’s interactions with the monsters.

The third Doctor is actually shown to take pleasure in destroying the Daleks or watching them be destroyed. In “Planet of the Daleks” after destroying a Dalek he remarks that “for a man who abhors violence I took an immense satisfaction in that”. Then there is the scene in “Death to the Daleks” where he happily watches an electric root destroy a Dalek and actually cheers it on!

Its hard to imagine the third Doctor actually take pleasure in another life form’s destruction. The third Doctor was one of the most virtuous Doctors of them all, so once again this was a perfect way to show how the Daleks were the Doctor’s worst enemies that they could provoke this type of reaction from him, that even the Master couldn’t.

Interestingly enough Jon Pertwee hated the Daleks. He said he found them to be laughable and boring villains. However I think he was actually able to work that into his performance quite well, as Pertwee’s own real life contempt for the Daleks was reflected in the third Doctors hatred of them.

4th Doctor and the Daleks

Now I think that Tom Baker has the single greatest Dalek story of all time “Genesis of the Daleks” and is obviously one of the best Doctors of all time. However sadly I don’t think he was a good Dalek Doctor at all. In both of his two stories to start with he actually has very little interaction with the monsters. Its really Davros he interacts with instead. In “Genesis” he must share the screen for all of two minutes with the monsters. However worse than that I just don’t think Tom’s Doctor was really a good fit for the Daleks as Tom’s Doctor is usually depicted as a man without fear.

That’s often one of the best things about his Doctors is the fact that he never shows even the slightest bit of worry even when faced with the worst villains in the universe such as Magnus Creel and Morbius. Sadly however this is not good for the Daleks, who as the Doctors oldest enemies should fill him with utter horror and dread. Look at the third Doctors reaction a lone Dalek in “Day of the Daleks” compared to the 4th Doctor being cornered by them in “Destiny of the Daleks” where he practically laughs at them.

Obviously having the Doctor not take them seriously and even point out their then inability to climb stairs greatly undermines their menace.

“If you’re supposed to be the superior creatures of the universe, why don’t you try climbing after us? BYE BYE.”

Thus even though he has the best Dalek story and probably the best Dalek related moment with the “have I the right” speech, I’d say the 4th Doctor was probably the worst fit for the Daleks of all the Doctors, and its probably just as well they didn’t use them that often during his tenure.

Tom Baker has always said that the Daleks were his favorite monsters because they were the children’s favorites.

The 80’s Doctors and the Daleks

Now I love all 3 80’s Doctors, but sadly I can’t really devote any time to their interactions with the Daleks. The reason is that none of them really had any memorable interactions with the monsters. Again that’s not to say that their Dalek stories were bad, far from it, but much like with the 4th Doctor, the Daleks don’t really get to interact with the Doctor much in their time as Davros takes centre stage, and therefore most of the Doctors interactions are with Davros instead. Added to this each of these Doctors only had one Dalek story on television and each story was not part of a major story arc or a major point in the development of the Doctors character.

That’s not to say there aren’t some great Doctor Dalek moments. The 7th Doctor being cornered by a Dalek flying up the stair after him for the first time is surely one of the most iconic moments in Who history.

I also felt there was a lot of potential for for all 3 80’s Doctors to be good Dalek Doctors. The 5th Doctor being a much more vulnerable character would have worked well as we could have seen how affected he was by the evil they caused and how, if anything they managed to push him too far. The 6th Doctor would have made an excellent Dalek Doctor due to his darker nature, you can imagine him getting angry and wanting to destroy every single last one of them. The 7th Doctor meanwhile due to his more manipulative nature I think would have been a good match for David Whitaker type of Daleks, more manipulative and sly villains.

Sadly however none of this potential was ever really realized on screen. The 80’s Doctors would go on to encounter the Daleks many more times in the Big Finish Audio stories, free of Davros. Of all of them I’d say the 6th Doctor is the best Dalek Doctor. I think that the 6th Doctors interactions with the Daleks are actually among the most interesting in the Big Finish Audio’s.

However since we are only looking at their television encounters with the Daleks, then sadly I have to conclude that all 3 80’s Doctors never got to establish a relationship with any of the 80’s Doctors and the Daleks the way the first 3 did.

For this same reason I will also be overlooking the 8th Doctor’s interactions with the Daleks, as again he only encountered them once on tv, via archive footage in “The Day of the Doctor” .  Finally I will also be skipping the War Doctor who also only encountered them in one scene.

All of the 80’s Doctors loved the Daleks, Colin Baker said they were his favorite monsters whilst Sylvester McCoy has said that he didn’t feel like the true Doctor until he fought the Daleks, which didn’t happen until the first story of his second series.

9th Doctor and the Daleks

Now the 9th Doctors interactions with the Daleks are probably the most celebrated and its not hard to see why.

Christopher Eccelston really captured the hatred the Doctor had for the villains, which had only been made worse by the Time War.

Its actually quite incredible just how much emotion Eccelston was able to project when acting alongside a totally inanimate object.

In many ways the 9th Doctors interactions with the monsters captured all of the very best elements of the first three Doctors interactions with them.

Like the 1st Doctor, the 9th Doctors character is really shaped by his dealings with the Daleks. It is the Daleks who after all made him into a much darker, more bitter and hateful character at the start of the series due to the time war. Eventually his darker qualities are fully brought to the fore in “Dalek” where he ends up pointing a gun at Rose to murder the Dalek that is now defenceless. Here he realizes just how far he has come, and with Rose’s help he is able to put his hatred behind him and move on and become a much better person.

We finally see how much the 9th Doctor has changed in the two part season finale “Bad Wolf/ The Parting of the Ways” where he refuses to sacrifice the earth to stop the Daleks. Unlike before where he (seemingly) slaughtered billions of innocent people in the time war to stop them, now he proudly declares that he would happily be “a coward” rather than a killer any day, and once again much like with the first Doctor we see what type of man he truly is through his dealings with the Daleks.

Like the Second Doctor we also see some rather interesting parallels between the Doctor and the Daleks during his time too. We see how both of them lost everything during the war and have become mere shadows of their former selves. Its not just a question of the both lost their entire worlds, but everything they believed in and even represented went up in flames at the end of the time war. The Doctor believed himself to be a good man “never cowardly nor cruel” yet he had now butchered billions of innocent men, women and children.

The Daleks meanwhile believed themselves to be destined to be the masters of the universe, but had now been virtually wiped out. They were for all intents and purposes a dead race, a thing of the past, with the few survivors living in the shadows and filth of other races like human beings. Thus both of them when we see them are mere shells of their former selves. The Daleks are mad or half human hybrids, the Doctor is angry, bitter and vengeful and even somewhat inept as a hero.

When the 9th Doctor says to the Dalek that “everything you stood for is gone” he is talking to himself just as much as he is to the Dalek. However at the same time whilst we see this rather interesting similarity between the Doctor and the Daleks, we also see how the Doctor is ultimately stronger. Both the Doctor and the Daleks are consumed by hatred after what happened in the time war, but Rose is able to help the Doctor overcome it and become the man he once was. The coward rather than the killer, but the Daleks who never knew anything but hatred are unable to move on further degenerate into caricatures of themselves as seen in the season finale with the mad human Daleks and the insane Emperor.

Finally the 9th Doctor obviously took 3’s hatred of them to a whole other level with the 9th Doctor at one point promising to exterminate the entire Dalek race at the end of “The Parting of the Ways” and trying to murder a helpless Dalek out of no reason other than vengeance in “Dalek”.

Of course a lot of credit for the 9th Doctors wonderful interactions with the Daleks has to go to Russell T Davies too. He was an excellent writer for the Daleks and really not only beefed them up as villains overall, but also their relationship with the Doctor too.

Christopher Eccelston though claiming to have never been that much of a Doctor Who fan growing up had stated that he nevertheless always enjoyed watching Dalek stories as he found it fascinating that a creature like a Dalek could be so evil and so pathetic at the same time. He also said he always wanted to see what the creature inside looked like.

10th Doctor and the Daleks

Now originally I didn’t think much of the Tenth Doctors interactions with the Daleks. After the way 9 played off of them, 10 seemed a bit tame in comparison. Now however I think that was actually the right thing to do as it made sense that that would be how the Doctor would react to them at this point in his life. The Tenth Doctor was a much more benevolent figure than 9 was. After having reached the absolute low point of his life as 9, 10 obviously was trying to control his darker impulses instead and become more like the hero he had been centuries earlier.

However we could see that that dark side in the 9th Doctor was still there lurking under the surface in 10 and would occasionally be let out such as against the Racnoss.

Thus when faced with the Daleks whom he knows can bring out the worst in him, just with their very existence. 10 has to hold it together every second. You can tell though at various points he wants to lose it and destroy them completely such as in “Daleks in Manhatten/ Evolution of the Daleks”.

Here he is genuinely devastated that they have survived yet again “they always survive while I lose everything”. And we see this with 10’s clone who acts in the way 10 would very much like to and finally wipes the Daleks out and makes them pay for all they have done to him.

10’s interactions with the Daleks also paved the way for 11’s, as with 9 we see a Doctor who embraces his hatred of the monsters and is taken to a very dark place, where he ends up pointing a gun at Rose in order to destroy the Metaltron. As a result 10 tries to hold that hatred in check and even tries to show compassion to the Daleks. However this results in great catastrophe for him.

For instance the compassion he showed to Dalek Caan at the end of “Evolution of the Daleks” was directly responsible for the deaths of all the millions of people the Daleks slaughtered when they stole the earth (including Harriet Jones) and also Donna losing her memory, as had he just destroyed Dalek Caan there and then the Daleks would have been finished, but his compassion allowed Caan to escape.

Naturally after this 11 has a renewed hatred and even stronger desire to finish them forever.

Whilst his interactions may not have been quite as tense as 9’s were, I still think 10 had quite an interesting dynamic with the Daleks, and served as the perfect bridge between the 9th and the 11th Doctors, both of whom utterly despised the Daleks.

David Tennant having been a life long Doctor Who fan absolutely adored the Daleks. His favorite ever story is in fact “Genesis of the Daleks” and he has said that it was actually this story that got him interested in Doctor Who in the first place.

11th Doctor and the Daleks

Now not many people think that the 11th Doctor was that well suited to the Daleks. Personally however I’d rank as one of the Doctors who played off of them the best. The 11th Doctor much like the 9th and the 3rd had a passionate hatred of the monsters. He reacted with violence towards them and was even shown again much like both the 3rd and 9th Doctors to take a delight in destroying them.

In some ways I actually found this to be more effective than the 9th Doctors interactions with them. The thing about Matt’s Doctor is again much like Jon Pertwee he is the last Doctor you’d expect to do something like that. You’d expect it from Chris who is a darker, more volatile Doctor, but Matt’s sweet, funny. painfully uncool Doctor is the last incarnation you’d expect to see casually tear open a Dalek.

What’s even more disturbing is how calm he is in doing it as well. Unlike the 9th Doctor he doesn’t shout and scream, showing that by this point its just become natural to him. His hatred of the Daleks now is a part of him as much as his heroic qualities.

I also as I said before think that 11’s hatred of them made perfect sense after the way 10 played off of them. 10 as we saw tried to show mercy to them, which turned out badly for him and his friends like Harriet Jones and Donna Noble.

11 unlike 10 who tried to hide his hatred for them, embraces it.

In real life Matt Smith absolutely loved the Daleks and even remarked that he found it difficult to hate them on screen as he loved them so much.

12th Doctor and the Daleks

Now I am not going to go into to much detail here as the 12th Doctor’s era has only begun and he has only had one story against the Daleks so far.

Still he has shown promise to have an interesting dynamic with them. Much like 3, 9 and 11 he is shown to have a deep hatred of them. Obviously Capaldi can do anger very well and is also brilliant at capturing the Doctors dark side.

However again its still too early to say how 12’s relationship will develop with them, but the character of Rusty a benevolent Dalek, or rather a Dalek that just hates its own kind certainly looks like it could offer up a fresh dynamic between the Doctor and his oldest and deadliest enemies.

Conclusion

As you can see the Doctors relationship with the Daleks has changed over the years, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worst, but its still always been a very complex and interesting relationship none the less.

Personally I’d say the best Dalek Doctors on screen are 2, 9, 1, 11, 3 and 10 in that order.